# Recipe critique.

**URL:** <https://forum.homebrewersassociation.org/t/recipe-critique/26330>\
**Category:** Beer Recipes\
**Created:** [October 2, 2017, 11:55pm UTC](https://forum.homebrewersassociation.org/t/recipe-critique/26330 "2017-10-02T23:55:24Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 9\
**Page:** 2

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![denny](https://sea1.discourse-cdn.com/brewersassociation/user_avatar/forum.homebrewersassociation.org/denny/32/13092_2.png) [@denny](https://forum.homebrewersassociation.org/u/denny)\
**Post date:** [October 6, 2017, 4:34pm UTC](https://forum.homebrewersassociation.org/t/recipe-critique/26330/21 "2017-10-06T16:34:13Z")

</div>

> [@JJeffers09](#):
>
> Yes, if it’s 300:100 or 150:50 so4/cl IIRC produce indistinguishable beers.
> 
> I think a stout stands up to minerally water very well.&nbsp; My .02 cents.
> 
> Sent from my SM-G955U1 using Tapatalk

That has not been my experience.&nbsp; I fond that the absolute values are more important than the ratio.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![stpug](https://sea1.discourse-cdn.com/brewersassociation/user_avatar/forum.homebrewersassociation.org/stpug/32/6766_2.png) [@stpug](https://forum.homebrewersassociation.org/u/stpug)\
**Post date:** [October 6, 2017, 4:56pm UTC](https://forum.homebrewersassociation.org/t/recipe-critique/26330/22 "2017-10-06T16:56:44Z")

</div>

> [@denny](#):
>
> > [@JJeffers09](#):
> >
> > Yes, if it’s 300:100 or 150:50 so4/cl IIRC produce indistinguishable beers.
> 
> That has not been my experience.&nbsp; I fond that the absolute values are more important than the ratio.

100% agree with Denny. Forget ratios, focus on concentrations.&nbsp; A ratio is just a byproduct of the concentration anyway.&nbsp; While the example in quotes above actually uses the concentration values, they are technically both 3:1 ratios but will produce significant differences in the final beer.

As for how chloride and sulfate will affect your perception of the beer, it’s not about sweetness vs bitterness.&nbsp; It’s more along the lines of fullness vs dryness.&nbsp; Chloride does not make a beer sweeter, however it does increase a perception of a fuller (bodied) beer, and since it doesn’t enhance the dryness then it may be perceived as “less dry” which folks might construe as “more sweet”.&nbsp; A similar but opposite thing happens with sulfate where it enhances a dry finish which has the potential to increase perceived bitterness, and in turn reduce perceived sweetness (but that takes decently elevated levels in my experience).&nbsp; Some similar but different explanations can be said of sodium and magnesium as well in regards to perception of enhancing flavors and increasing minerality and/or bitterness.&nbsp; And, no, reduction of sulfate/chloride to low (but reasonable) levels does not make a bland beer or increase blandness.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![dmtaylor](https://sea1.discourse-cdn.com/brewersassociation/user_avatar/forum.homebrewersassociation.org/dmtaylor/32/9644_2.png) [@dmtaylor](https://forum.homebrewersassociation.org/u/dmtaylor)\
**Post date:** [October 6, 2017, 5:01pm UTC](https://forum.homebrewersassociation.org/t/recipe-critique/26330/23 "2017-10-06T17:01:18Z")

</div>

> [@stpug](#):
>
> And, no, reduction of sulfate/chloride to low (but reasonable) levels does not make a bland beer or increase blandness.

I misspoke slightly previously.&nbsp; Thanks for cleaning this up.&nbsp; I totally agree.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![curtdogg](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/c/d9b06d/32.png) [@curtdogg](https://forum.homebrewersassociation.org/u/curtdogg)\
**Post date:** [October 9, 2017, 3:46am UTC](https://forum.homebrewersassociation.org/t/recipe-critique/26330/24 "2017-10-09T03:46:55Z")

</div>

> [@stpug](#):
>
> > [@denny](#):
> >
> > > [@JJeffers09](#):
> > >
> > > Yes, if it’s 300:100 or 150:50 so4/cl IIRC produce indistinguishable beers.
> > 
> > That has not been my experience.&nbsp; I fond that the absolute values are more important than the ratio.
> 
> 100% agree with Denny. Forget ratios, focus on concentrations.&nbsp; A ratio is just a byproduct of the concentration anyway.&nbsp; While the example in quotes above actually uses the concentration values, they are technically both 3:1 ratios but will produce significant differences in the final beer.
> 
> As for how chloride and sulfate will affect your perception of the beer, it’s not about sweetness vs bitterness.&nbsp; It’s more along the lines of fullness vs dryness.&nbsp; Chloride does not make a beer sweeter, however it does increase a perception of a fuller (bodied) beer, and since it doesn’t enhance the dryness then it may be perceived as “less dry” which folks might construe as “more sweet”.&nbsp; A similar but opposite thing happens with sulfate where it enhances a dry finish which has the potential to increase perceived bitterness, and in turn reduce perceived sweetness (but that takes decently elevated levels in my experience).&nbsp; Some similar but different explanations can be said of sodium and magnesium as well in regards to perception of enhancing flavors and increasing minerality and/or bitterness.&nbsp; And, no, reduction of sulfate/chloride to low (but reasonable) levels does not make a bland beer or increase blandness.

Thanks for your input. Ive been reading alot about this lately and my understanding is exactly how you explained it above. I have made a minerally overly smokey stout before, and i want to avoid that again. I think my biggest mistake last time was a mash pH of 5.2, I believe that is what caused the&nbsp; smoky ashy flavor.  
With that said,&nbsp; this time around I will be using a higher pH 5.5-5.6 and going with what i feel is a “ratio” that will help enhance both body and a dry finish. 80s04/60Calchl ppm.

Please share your thoughts if you have any.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![jonhughey\_att.net](https://sea1.discourse-cdn.com/brewersassociation/user_avatar/forum.homebrewersassociation.org/jonhughey_att.net/32/6277_2.png) [@jonhughey\_att.net](https://forum.homebrewersassociation.org/u/jonhughey_att.net)\
**Post date:** [October 9, 2017, 12:07pm UTC](https://forum.homebrewersassociation.org/t/recipe-critique/26330/25 "2017-10-09T12:07:58Z")

</div>

> [@stpug](#):
>
> > [@denny](#):
> >
> > > [@JJeffers09](#):
> > >
> > > Yes, if it’s 300:100 or 150:50 so4/cl IIRC produce indistinguishable beers.
> > 
> > That has not been my experience.&nbsp; I fond that the absolute values are more important than the ratio.
> 
> 100% agree with Denny. Forget ratios, focus on concentrations.&nbsp; A ratio is just a byproduct of the concentration anyway.&nbsp; While the example in quotes above actually uses the concentration values, they are technically both 3:1 ratios but will produce significant differences in the final beer.
> 
> As for how chloride and sulfate will affect your perception of the beer, it’s not about sweetness vs bitterness.&nbsp; It’s more along the lines of fullness vs dryness.&nbsp; Chloride does not make a beer sweeter, however it does increase a perception of a fuller (bodied) beer, and since it doesn’t enhance the dryness then it may be perceived as “less dry” which folks might construe as “more sweet”.&nbsp; A similar but opposite thing happens with sulfate where it enhances a dry finish which has the potential to increase perceived bitterness, and in turn reduce perceived sweetness (but that takes decently elevated levels in my experience).&nbsp; Some similar but different explanations can be said of sodium and magnesium as well in regards to perception of enhancing flavors and increasing minerality and/or bitterness.&nbsp; And, no, reduction of sulfate/chloride to low (but reasonable) levels does not make a bland beer or increase blandness.

Totally agree.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![joelv](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/j/43a26b/32.png) [@joelv](https://forum.homebrewersassociation.org/u/joelv)\
**Post date:** [October 9, 2017, 7:38pm UTC](https://forum.homebrewersassociation.org/t/recipe-critique/26330/26 "2017-10-09T19:38:34Z")

</div>

I just brewed a variation of this about two months ago.  
RO water  
2.5 grams Gypsum  
3 grams calcium chloride  
8 grams baking soda (all in mash)

I had about 22 lbs. of fermentables in the mash with 2.5 being highly roasted and 1.5 total crystal (some 40, some 90, some 120)

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![curtdogg](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/c/d9b06d/32.png) [@curtdogg](https://forum.homebrewersassociation.org/u/curtdogg)\
**Post date:** [October 10, 2017, 2:02am UTC](https://forum.homebrewersassociation.org/t/recipe-critique/26330/27 "2017-10-10T02:02:03Z")

</div>

> [@joelv](#):
>
> I just brewed a variation of this about two months ago.  
> RO water  
> 2.5 grams Gypsum  
> 3 grams calcium chloride  
> 8 grams baking soda (all in mash)
> 
> I had about 22 lbs. of fermentables in the mash with 2.5 being highly roasted and 1.5 total crystal (some 40, some 90, some 120)
> 
> Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

8 grams holy schnikey. What was your mash pH?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![JJeffers09](https://sea1.discourse-cdn.com/brewersassociation/user_avatar/forum.homebrewersassociation.org/jjeffers09/32/11256_2.png) [@JJeffers09](https://forum.homebrewersassociation.org/u/JJeffers09)\
**Post date:** [October 10, 2017, 2:06am UTC](https://forum.homebrewersassociation.org/t/recipe-critique/26330/28 "2017-10-10T02:06:49Z")

</div>

> [@curtdogg](#):
>
> > [@joelv](#):
> >
> > I just brewed a variation of this about two months ago.  
> > RO water  
> > 2.5 grams Gypsum  
> > 3 grams calcium chloride  
> > 8 grams baking soda (all in mash)
> > 
> > I had about 22 lbs. of fermentables in the mash with 2.5 being highly roasted and 1.5 total crystal (some 40, some 90, some 120)
> > 
> > Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
> 
> 8 grams holy schnikey. What was your mash pH?
> 
> Sent from my SM-G930P using Tapatalk

I was thinking the same thing, probably 5.7-8 target? With what 2#+ of roasted malt?!

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![joelv](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/j/43a26b/32.png) [@joelv](https://forum.homebrewersassociation.org/u/joelv)\
**Post date:** [December 13, 2017, 8:45pm UTC](https://forum.homebrewersassociation.org/t/recipe-critique/26330/29 "2017-12-13T20:45:05Z")

</div>

> [@JJeffers09](#):
>
> > [@curtdogg](#):
> >
> > > [@joelv](#):
> > >
> > > I just brewed a variation of this about two months ago.  
> > > RO water  
> > > 2.5 grams Gypsum  
> > > 3 grams calcium chloride  
> > > 8 grams baking soda (all in mash)
> > > 
> > > I had about 22 lbs. of fermentables in the mash with 2.5 being highly roasted and 1.5 total crystal (some 40, some 90, some 120)
> > > 
> > > Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
> > 
> > 8 grams holy schnikey. What was your mash pH?
> > 
> > Sent from my SM-G930P using Tapatalk
> 
> I was thinking the same thing, probably 5.7-8 target? With what 2#+ of roasted malt?!
> 
> Sent from my SM-G955U1 using Tapatalk

Geez… I never replied (sorry). The roasted malts were:

1 lb chocolate  
3/4 lb roasted barley  
1/2 debittered Black.

[Previous page](https://forum.homebrewersassociation.org/t/recipe-critique/26330.md?page=1)
