# Using Yeast Slurry?... Now I'm concerned about Lag Time!?

**URL:** <https://forum.homebrewersassociation.org/t/using-yeast-slurry-now-im-concerned-about-lag-time/29368>\
**Category:** Ingredients\
**Created:** [December 13, 2019, 2:08pm UTC](https://forum.homebrewersassociation.org/t/using-yeast-slurry-now-im-concerned-about-lag-time/29368 "2019-12-13T14:08:53Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 14\
**Page:** 1

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![OhDannyBoy](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/o/838e76/32.png) [@OhDannyBoy](https://forum.homebrewersassociation.org/u/OhDannyBoy)\
**Post date:** [December 13, 2019, 2:08pm UTC](https://forum.homebrewersassociation.org/t/using-yeast-slurry-now-im-concerned-about-lag-time/29368/1 "2019-12-13T14:08:53Z")

</div>

So, it’s my first time using slurry…

Mr Malty’s Repitching from Slurry Calculator (default settings) said for a 10 litre batch @ 1.054 OG I required 76ml @ 60% Viability (been in the fermenter for 4 weeks at time of harvesting, so estimated harvest date at 3 weeks ago).

Now I’m concerned about Lag Time, so far it’s been 18 hours with little sign of air lock (bubbles) activity. It’s in a white plastic bucket so I can’t really see what’s going on inside?

Any feedback, suggestions or calming words folks?

Cheers! Dan :o

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![denny](https://sea1.discourse-cdn.com/brewersassociation/user_avatar/forum.homebrewersassociation.org/denny/32/13092_2.png) [@denny](https://forum.homebrewersassociation.org/u/denny)\
**Post date:** [December 13, 2019, 3:09pm UTC](https://forum.homebrewersassociation.org/t/using-yeast-slurry-now-im-concerned-about-lag-time/29368/2 "2019-12-13T15:09:19Z")

</div>

18 hours is a moment in terms of lag time.&nbsp; Relax.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Bob357](https://sea1.discourse-cdn.com/brewersassociation/user_avatar/forum.homebrewersassociation.org/bob357/32/4014_2.png) [@Bob357](https://forum.homebrewersassociation.org/u/Bob357)\
**Post date:** [December 13, 2019, 3:32pm UTC](https://forum.homebrewersassociation.org/t/using-yeast-slurry-now-im-concerned-about-lag-time/29368/3 "2019-12-13T15:32:00Z")

</div>

Airlock activity is a poor indicator of fermentation, especially when using a bucket. Bucket lids are notorious for not sealing well. Also, as Denny stated, 18 hours lag time isn’t a problem. Give it another day and then try shining a strong flashlight or lamp from the back side of the bucket and look for a shadowy area above the liquid level.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![profitt\_chartermi.net](https://sea1.discourse-cdn.com/brewersassociation/user_avatar/forum.homebrewersassociation.org/profitt_chartermi.net/32/20691_2.png) [@profitt\_chartermi.net](https://forum.homebrewersassociation.org/u/profitt_chartermi.net)\
**Post date:** [December 13, 2019, 4:47pm UTC](https://forum.homebrewersassociation.org/t/using-yeast-slurry-now-im-concerned-about-lag-time/29368/4 "2019-12-13T16:47:46Z")

</div>

Keep in mind too that lag time is more a problem in the minds of homebrewers than to the yeast. What we call “lag” is actually part of the normal yeast life cycle. Think of it as a distance runner eating pasta before before a big race. They are loading up in preparation for a big energy expenditure.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![slowbrew](https://sea1.discourse-cdn.com/brewersassociation/user_avatar/forum.homebrewersassociation.org/slowbrew/32/8927_2.png) [@slowbrew](https://forum.homebrewersassociation.org/u/slowbrew)\
**Post date:** [December 13, 2019, 6:00pm UTC](https://forum.homebrewersassociation.org/t/using-yeast-slurry-now-im-concerned-about-lag-time/29368/5 "2019-12-13T18:00:20Z")

</div>

An example that might help.&nbsp; I kegged a English Golden Ale on Tuesday that had taken 4 days to get started.&nbsp; I think I learned a bit about London Ale III.&nbsp; Like ambient temp ~54F may be too low for my timelines but once it gets going it gets the job done.

I ended up raising the wort up into the low 60’s to get it rolling but only because I need the beer for a family get together on 12/21.

Slow is okay, give the little beasties time to do there thing.

Paul

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![grhand202](https://sea1.discourse-cdn.com/brewersassociation/user_avatar/forum.homebrewersassociation.org/grhand202/32/8206_2.png) [@grhand202](https://forum.homebrewersassociation.org/u/grhand202)\
**Post date:** [December 13, 2019, 6:43pm UTC](https://forum.homebrewersassociation.org/t/using-yeast-slurry-now-im-concerned-about-lag-time/29368/6 "2019-12-13T18:43:54Z")

</div>

Something else to consider…did you just grab some slurry and pitch it, or did you create a starter with that slurry first? If you just pitched the slurry, then a longer lag time would be expected than if you created a starter and got the yeast active before pitching.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![OhDannyBoy](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/o/838e76/32.png) [@OhDannyBoy](https://forum.homebrewersassociation.org/u/OhDannyBoy)\
**Post date:** [December 14, 2019, 5:31pm UTC](https://forum.homebrewersassociation.org/t/using-yeast-slurry-now-im-concerned-about-lag-time/29368/7 "2019-12-14T17:31:04Z")

</div>

> [@denny](#):
>
> 18 hours is a moment in terms of lag time.&nbsp; Relax.

Phew!.. Cheers Denny 😉 Yeasties are happily bubbling away now! 😃

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![OhDannyBoy](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/o/838e76/32.png) [@OhDannyBoy](https://forum.homebrewersassociation.org/u/OhDannyBoy)\
**Post date:** [December 14, 2019, 5:37pm UTC](https://forum.homebrewersassociation.org/t/using-yeast-slurry-now-im-concerned-about-lag-time/29368/8 "2019-12-14T17:37:09Z")

</div>

> [@Bob357](#):
>
> Airlock activity is a poor indicator of fermentation, especially when using a bucket. Bucket lids are notorious for not sealing well. Also, as Denny stated, 18 hours lag time isn’t a problem. Give it another day and then try shining a strong flashlight or lamp from the back side of the bucket and look for a shadowy area above the liquid level.

Cheers Bob 😉 I always make sure I have an airtight seal by applying a very small amount of pressure to the lid with my finger and seeing if the bubbler moves very slightly - very scientific I know 😛 First krausen is there now 😃

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![OhDannyBoy](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/o/838e76/32.png) [@OhDannyBoy](https://forum.homebrewersassociation.org/u/OhDannyBoy)\
**Post date:** [December 14, 2019, 5:38pm UTC](https://forum.homebrewersassociation.org/t/using-yeast-slurry-now-im-concerned-about-lag-time/29368/9 "2019-12-14T17:38:25Z")

</div>

> [@kevin](#):
>
> Keep in mind too that lag time is more a problem in the minds of homebrewers than to the yeast. What we call “lag” is actually part of the normal yeast life cycle. Think of it as a distance runner eating pasta before before a big race. They are loading up in preparation for a big energy expenditure.

Cheers Kevin 😉

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![OhDannyBoy](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/o/838e76/32.png) [@OhDannyBoy](https://forum.homebrewersassociation.org/u/OhDannyBoy)\
**Post date:** [December 14, 2019, 5:40pm UTC](https://forum.homebrewersassociation.org/t/using-yeast-slurry-now-im-concerned-about-lag-time/29368/10 "2019-12-14T17:40:37Z")

</div>

> [@slowbrew](#):
>
> An example that might help.&nbsp; I kegged a English Golden Ale on Tuesday that had taken 4 days to get started.&nbsp; I think I learned a bit about London Ale III.&nbsp; Like ambient temp ~54F may be too low for my timelines but once it gets going it gets the job done.
> 
> I ended up raising the wort up into the low 60’s to get it rolling but only because I need the beer for a family get together on 12/21.
> 
> Slow is okay, give the little beasties time to do there thing.
> 
> Paul

Cheers Paul 😉

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![OhDannyBoy](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/o/838e76/32.png) [@OhDannyBoy](https://forum.homebrewersassociation.org/u/OhDannyBoy)\
**Post date:** [December 14, 2019, 5:46pm UTC](https://forum.homebrewersassociation.org/t/using-yeast-slurry-now-im-concerned-about-lag-time/29368/11 "2019-12-14T17:46:39Z")

</div>

> [@](#):
>
> Something else to consider…did you just grab some slurry and pitch it, or did you create a starter with that slurry first? If you just pitched the slurry, then a longer lag time would be expected than if you created a starter and got the yeast active before pitching.

Cheers Robert 😉 I didn’t make a starter, I took it out of the fridge on brewday morning, it’s was at 18c by the time I pitched. Good to hear that it isn’t a problem as a lot of writing seems to say 3-15 hrs for Lag Phase. I won’t worry next time 8)

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![OhDannyBoy](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/o/838e76/32.png) [@OhDannyBoy](https://forum.homebrewersassociation.org/u/OhDannyBoy)\
**Post date:** [December 14, 2019, 5:51pm UTC](https://forum.homebrewersassociation.org/t/using-yeast-slurry-now-im-concerned-about-lag-time/29368/12 "2019-12-14T17:51:28Z")

</div>

Oh!.. and I understand that different yeast strains behave differently, so just for any future reference, this was Wyeast 1098 British Ale. 😉

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![ynotbrusum](https://sea1.discourse-cdn.com/brewersassociation/user_avatar/forum.homebrewersassociation.org/ynotbrusum/32/10316_2.png) [@ynotbrusum](https://forum.homebrewersassociation.org/u/ynotbrusum)\
**Post date:** [December 15, 2019, 1:09pm UTC](https://forum.homebrewersassociation.org/t/using-yeast-slurry-now-im-concerned-about-lag-time/29368/13 "2019-12-15T13:09:48Z")

</div>

Another thing about using slurry is that you can try to time your batches so you are repitching immediately from a prior fermenter upon racking out from that primary.&nbsp; This ensures highly viable yeast slurry.&nbsp; Yesterday I racked a batch onto a yeast cake in a fermenter that I had just racked from, only cleaning off the Krausen ring with a sanitized paper towel.&nbsp; I don’t do this often, but it is a bigger lager beer that just went in as the second batch…  
Cheers!

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![OhDannyBoy](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/o/838e76/32.png) [@OhDannyBoy](https://forum.homebrewersassociation.org/u/OhDannyBoy)\
**Post date:** [December 15, 2019, 2:57pm UTC](https://forum.homebrewersassociation.org/t/using-yeast-slurry-now-im-concerned-about-lag-time/29368/14 "2019-12-15T14:57:33Z")

</div>

> [@ynotbrusum](#):
>
> Another thing about using slurry is that you can try to time your batches so you are repitching immediately from a prior fermenter upon racking out from that primary.&nbsp; This ensures highly viable yeast slurry.&nbsp; Yesterday I racked a batch onto a yeast cake in a fermenter that I had just racked from, only cleaning off the Krausen ring with a sanitized paper towel.&nbsp; I don’t do this often, but it is a bigger lager beer that just went in as the second batch…  
> Cheers!

Cheers 😉 At present I don’t transfer for secondary/conditioning, just 3-4 weeks in same bucket for primary and a fair bit of secondary. I may consider changing my process when using slurry, it makes sense to pitch slurry when highly viable 😉 Alternatively I may just make a vitality starter so it’s raring to go! I understand that there will always be a Lag Phase though as the Yeasties have to acclimatise to there new environment and prepare to reproduce.
