I have a ~4" braid connected to the outlet with a ~4" piece of 1/2" copper pipe w/ hacksaw slots on the tail end. Stops the floating issue and if the wort wants to go through the pipe slots or braid or a combination of the two, then help yourself. Never had a problem of any kind with this setup. My cooler is red w/blue stripes too. I like the best of both worlds.
The grain bed compresses around the braid forming what amounts to a pipe with perforations. The more perforations which are provided by the longer braid /pipe the more wort that can be filtered as the grain bed compresses or as the filtering slows due to clogging of the braid by fines or sticky material. If all goes right you wouldn’t need a long braid but when adding wheat or rye the additional length gives you an added safety factor.
I’m not saying a short tube won’t work, but the added length is a nice safety factor. Just stands to reason that the more surface area your filter has, the faster it will allow the runnings to flow and the less likely it will clog.
I’ve done an experiment where I fill the cooler with water, and the start lifting the braid from the water by the end farthest from the outlet. The flow rate remains unchanged. This says to me that the braid length doesn’t make all that much difference. Is this an invalid test?
That test is not representative of the conditions when conducting a mash. I would imagine you would have to conduct a series of tests with different length braids and different mashes which incorporated varying amounts of wheat and rye and then measure the volume/rate of flow from the valve in order to be conclusive.
You’re right Denny. It won’t make a difference, all the fluid passes through the hole in the wall. Gravity brings it to the bottom of the container. A longer braid may help as far as clogging goes, though, as the grain has a larger surface area to compress. With a short braid or for the sake of arguement just a screen in a fitting in the hole, if the grain is compressed against it, it has a better chance of becoming clogged.
The flow of wort will be most affected by the limiting factor which is the size or diameter of the hole from which it is flowing through in some cases. In other words if you had a 30" braid and a 1/8" hole the flow would be restricted mostly by 1/8" hole.
The question in my mind is “where is the bottleneck” in the system. The grain bed…the braid…the outlet dia…or all of the above.
The short answer is that they are all dependent upon each other to do their job but ultimately one will be a bottleneck per say. One must look at the system from a fluid dynamics perspective and make the assessment.
That’s exactly what were saying regarding the length of the braid. A longer braid is less likely to clog because of the increased surface area therefore less likely to cause a stuck sparge.
Yeah, in Denny’s experiment the limiting factor is the outlet hole, the braid is no real impediment at all if there’s just water in the mash tun. For a mash though, bits of flour or wheat/oats from the grist can clog a braid depending on the hole size. So you’d need to do the experiment with consistent grist and different length hoses to figure it out for sure, and then vary the grist with the hoses as well.
Hose length obviously does make a difference theoretically, but it might not make a difference in practical terms depending on your mash conditions. It sounds like it makes no practical difference for Denny’s typical mashes.