I’m not saying you do it all the time, Denny, but 90 percent of all homebrewing arguments I read on many forums amount to “my method is good because the beer I make is good. End of discussion for me.” Scientific research has shown that this line of reasoning started with the old Egyptians who drank beer through a straw because they didn’t filter. It is as yet unclear when and how this method changed
I protest vehemently. You are an Object of Reverence and Reference. I have your Books. I listen to your Podcasts (although I have to admit I skip the ukulele part). I brew your Recipes. But your argument boils down to a decision on return on investment. And that is different for each person, I assume.
Bingo. Brew however you enjoy. Have a blast doing decoctions? Go for it. Love the science and geekery of matching a commercial brewery? Go for it. Love making simple extract IPAs? Same thing.
I still haven’t brewed LODO, though I’m moving that way. I enjoy the technical details, that’s fun to me, and others. But I see the process as a means to an end…a tool to be used differently depending on the outcome that you seek…some beers likely shouldn’t be LODO. (some old British styles come to mind, and from the sound of it possibly Vienna lagers.)
For me that’s not, as colonel Landa would say it, a bingo. It is my ambition for my next beer to be better than my previous, and I still have the impression that I have an order of magnitude to go.
I’ve been using Best Pils as my base and have heard from them the last crop has a higher than usual gelatinization temp and recommend a rest at 65c so I’ve been doing a 20/20/20/10 step mash at 62c, 65,72,76, gives me attenuation in low 80’s.