Initially, the temp was 31 F. For many months. Now it is stored at 35-38 F.
Watched a long interview with Charlie Bamforth. He discussed the negative impact of elevated temperature on beer over long term storage. It convinced me to keep the beer cold, real cold, regardless of how long you want to age / store it.
It also depends on what storage capacity you have. Currently I brew beer in the 4-6% range, a month’s worth at a time, so no long tome storage issues.
I don’t know when (if) I’ll ever have the ability to age anything at low temperature.
So, VillageTaphouse: what attenuations were you getting from this most recent group of S-04s? (I see Steve Ruch was getting 72% to 82%, with a 75% noted in there.) Given the recent change in this strain that some are alluding to, I was wondering if older experiences of AA% are still reliable.
I had no intention of trying S-04 in the near future, but now maybe I might.
ETA: also, I just saw Dave [dmtaylor] mention on another thread that he is consistently getting 78%-80% recently. Might have to try a few generations of this.
I just brewed an Amber Ale and a bitter with S04. Bother we’re mashed at about 151F for 60 minutes. Both had approximately 8% caramel malts, 91% base malts, and 1% roasted malts for color. Both had 83% apparent attenuation.
I just got 82% on my last batch with S-04, went from 1.073 to 1.013. This was a Munich based beer that I mashed at 150 F for 65 minutes. A different batch before that got 78%. This is a good yeast. Unlike some other yeasts, this one drops crystal clear after a few days; however I do have a chill haze on the current batch, not sure why, it does clear as it warms.
Still no fruitiness, no diacetyl, no sulfur, nothing off. Very neutral, like you wish US-05 was but isn’t.
I think people put too much emphasis on yeast attenuation rating. It’s simply a way of comparing one yeast to another and doesn’t necessarikky have my bearing on the attenuation you can expect. I’ve had the experience of the same yeast giving me both 65 and 85%. I feel it’s as least, if not more, dependent on wort.
I think tracking the average attenuation of S-04 in particular, and how it’s clear to many that it’s changed, over time, helps prove that it’s not the same yeast strain today as it was 10-20 years ago. There can be merit in paying attenuation to such things. Not to every little anecdote, of course, but the overall trend of many people & many batches.