I’ll be a good boy and leave the sugar in as per Drew’s recipe. I’ll even brew all the recipes from the book without any change whatsoever, as long as I can skip the shroom beer. Me no like shroom beer.
Maybe not, but I’ve tried one mushroom beer that is easily in my top 5 of worst beers ever: Desprat Tête Noire, made with “cèpes d’Auvergne”. In principle they are amongst the best mushrooms in the world, and I’ll gladly collect them in the woods, prepare and eat them. But in beer? "The horror! The horror!”
There is actually science that supports the premise that sacc gives up the fight if you give it a wort with too much glucose. It’s one reason why you can get a stalled or stuck fermentation right at the beginning. If sacc has enough glucose to consume then it won’t release the enzymes to break down more complex sugars. But you really have to go wild with glucose and only glucose.
do you have a link to something about that? I ask out of curiousity. I have done the late addition and still do when I’m using honey or maple syrup. it sounds like it’s not much of an issue from our perspective but I would like to see it anyway.
Everybody has their perfect strategy for saisons. I wouldn’t target trying to make the perfect saison off the bat because you can and should experiment to find what you love.
Personally I am not a huge fan of saisons that have been dried down to the low single digits in FG. I find them too watery and lacking in malt character. There are good very low FG saisons when you are also using brett and/or acidifying bacteria but beers with just sacc and a lot of sugar added to the kettle or fermentor are just not the same.
I have tasted my citra saison. Best beer I have ever made. I am so grateful for the recipe and the advice.
Still, one question: although the beer ended at 1002, I still seem to taste some residual sugar. And I write “seem” because I’m not even very sure it’s sweet. What could that be? The wheat? The citra? Something else?
If you used 3711 , it leaves a fuller mouthfeel than the FG would lead you to believe. And fruity hops like Citra, Mosaic, El Dorado,etc., definitely give the beer a fruity flavor. I think your brain gets tricked into thinking that the fruity hop character is actual sweetness where there is none. But it sure can seem like it. BTW, nice job, sounds good !
+1 - 3711 produces a fair amount of glycerol, which leads to a nice mouthfeel despite finishing bone dry. Oily, citrusy hops will also leave an impression of sweetness even though they’re not sweet. Which is why there are a lot of lousy commercial IPA’s, IMO. Underattenuation plus fruity hops is just not pleasant to me.
Totally agree. Limiting crystal and mashing low lets you get away with pretty fruity hop character. I guess a fair number of breweries must see it differently. To each his own.