FWIW, a lot of IPAs these days are at 1-1.2 BU:GU. A lot more goes into perceived bitterness than just an IBU number or ratio - your grist (things like crystal malts especially), mash temp, attenuation,etc., all play a part in how you perceive bitterness. Even the bittering hop you pick has a big role - bitter with a hop like Columbus or Chinook and you get a more coarse IPA-like bitterness (pleasantly coarse IMO), but bitter with Warrior or Magnum and you get a softer, smoother bitterness.
German Merkur is even smoother than magnum IMO for high alpha bittering hop- it has lower Co-Humulone level than magnum. Ive switched over to it and been happy.
I’d say keep the Bravo. I heard an amazing seminar about hops from Stan Hieronymus. One of the takeaways from it was using a little bit of Bravo bumped up the profile of other hops. An intriguing concept…enough so that I ordered some Bravo to try it out.
Ken, in the last few years, it’s been shown that cohumulone isn’t as important to “smothness” as was previously thought. Also, I would argue that an IPA doesn’t benefit from smooth, low key bitterness…at least for me. I want a firm, assertive bitterness in my IPA.
I can’t argue it Denny. i do prefer smooth bitterness vs bite so hard I cringe in IPA…just my preference I would agree that perceiving the contribution for me has been with my pale yellow beers like pils, so I just have continued to use merkur.
WY1450 is misperceived as a “malty” yeast…it accentuates mouthfeel, but not really malt. I “discovered” it when I was formulating my Rye IPA recipe, which is dry hopped. In fact, I’d say 90% of the beers I use it for are dry hopped, so no worries there.
And yes, that’s my basic hop strategy with any beer. But keep in mind that if I want more late hops and they make the recipe exceed the bitterness I want, I’ll cut back the bittering hops to compensate.