Steeping Crystal Malt

I’m going to do an extract brew and I intend to use 1 lb of 40 L crystal malt to improve mouthfeel and colour.  I will probably also add about 2 tbsp of black patent malt to darken it a bit more. 
When I steep the grain, should I do it in a grain bag in the whole 6 gallons I intend to boil or is more/less effective to do it in a smaller volume so I can control the temperature better.  I’m thinking maybe a gallon of water at 150-155 degrees F?  How long would you steep it for?  Or, just throw the grain bag in and let it sit in as it heats up and pull it out before it boils?

Is 1 lb of crystal malt enough to really make an impression in 5 gals of beer?  If not, how much for next time?

Thanks

You want to steep the pound of crystal & BP in a grain bag in about a gallon of water for about 30 minutes. 155F is fine. Then top off to get your pre-boil volume. You’ll definitely taste a pound of C40.  Cheers!!!

You can steep in the entire volume, especially if there are no base malts. Be sure the malt is crushed before steeping and remove the bag well before the boil starts.

+1.  You’ll get best extraction steeping in the full volume before adding base malts or extracts.  I’d throw the bag in there as the water is heating up and check w/ thermometer from time to time.  Remove when temp hits around 170F.

+1. This way is easiest. Why measure water twice?  Steeping time doesn’t matter much. This way let’s you get the most out of it while not adding any extra complexity. Good on you for doing full boils. Most people don’t do those until going all grain. Better for hop utilization.

By steeping C40 & BP in the full volume won’t create an acidic environment where tannins might be extracted?  Cheers!!!

I’ll admit that I hadn’t thought of that.  I usually mini-mash & throw my specialty grains into the tun.  Haven’t steeped in quite a while.

Here’s an quote from a prior post… When I brewed extract I always steeped with a gallon or two for this reason, PH. I was mistaken by saying acidic in an earlier post. Should be alkaline, or high PH.  But all of this depends on the brewer’s water.  Cheers!!!

I never ever had any issues in the extract days steeping in the full wort volume, but I was NOT partial mashing or using any base malt.

Doesn’t matter if your mashing or not.  The issue is that, above 170F and with higher pH, tannins can be extracted from the husks of the grain.  If you limit the amount of water, then the grain has enough power to lower the pH below the danger level - with full boil water volume, it might not.  In any case, as long as you get the grains out of the water well before it reaches 170F, you shouldn’t see any tannin problems.

I suggest steeping the grain in a limited volume of water. Especially if your water is high in alkalinity.

Here is an example:

C40 provides about 25 mEq of acid per kg when titrated to a pH of 5.7. I got this from experiments I did a while back. A pound will give you about 12 mEq acidity.

If you have 20 l of water with a residual alkalinity 100 ppm as CaCO3 you have about 40 mEq of acid neutralizing power in that water. Since these 40 are higher than the 12 mEq that you are getting from the malt you are likely to end up with a pH higher than 5.7. Possibly even in the 6s

On the other hand, if you steep the C40 in just 2 l of water, the acid neutralizing power you are getting from the water is only 4 mEq which is less than the 12 from the malt and your pH should be less than 5.7.

Kai

Man, this is getting complicated.
Thanks everyone.  My water is already 7.6 pH (I keep cichlids and pH is important for these fish so I’ve checked it out).  We live in an area with limestone bedrock and we go through coffee makers like crazy thanks to all the calcium build up.

Based on what’s been discussed here, I am going to steep in 2L of water while the larger volume heats up outside.  I boil outside on a turkey fryer so that I don’t have so much humidity indoors and it can take an hour to get 25L of water up to the boil anyway.  I’ll leave out a few liters from the pot to add the steeping liquid in when it gets close to a boil.

The rest of my recipe, if you’re interested looks like this.
6 lbs golden light DME
1 oz Northern Brewer @ 60 min
1 oz Northern Brewer @ 30 min
1/2 oz Fuggles and 1/2 oz East Kent Goldings at 15 mins
1/2 oz Fuggles and 1/2 oz East Kent Goldings at 5 mins ( I have both so I figured a bit of each.  I could easily be talked into 1 oz of one and one oz of the other.  Which is better as aroma and which as flavour?
Wyeast London ESB Yeast in a starter right now.

Plan to brew tomorrow.
Should I take the plunge and start to look at going all grain?  That seems to be where most people end up.  I’ve always wanted to but I’ve been out of homebrewing for a while now and just getting back into it.  But I’m willing to take the plunge.

ho - good point about the temp, I always put the grains in the cold water and then ramped up to 170F and removed. If the OP will do that he should be golden.

pH is not a measure of the water’s alkalinity. Our well water has a pH of 6.5 and an alkalinity close to Munich water. I’d assume that your water is fairly alkaline if you live in a lime stone area. If you have fish you may also have a test kit for general hardness and alkalinity.

[quote]… and it can take an hour to get 25L of water up to the boil anyway.
[/quote]

This is also an additional practical benefit to steeping in a limited volume.

Don’t do it b/c a lot of brewers end up there. But with a well established process AG adds takes only little additional time compared to extract brewing.

Kai

I believe pH is more important for tannin extraction than temperature. I remember brewing Alton Brown’s Pale Ale which calls for boiling the grains and I don’t remember it being astringent.

Kai

I often wondered if people boiled the grains after that episode and what the results were… ;D

I boiled a pound of rye malt in the last two batches I brewed due to a mis-understanding regarding instructions and I can tell you my result was cloudy beer. 
I brewed an ale first that is now sitting in my cold room and the haze is very slowly settling out.  It wasn’t intended to be aged but I figured what the heck.  It was really cloudy so what is there to lose by letting it sit.
The second was a Cal. Lager beer with 1 lb of rye boiled again.  It was also cloudy but I bottled it anyway and the haze has settled out as it sat to carbonate.  It’s actually pretty decent.  It has a high hops level to start with so I don’t notice any tannic astringency but I’m no expert.  Probably in lighter hopped and lighter flavoured beers you would be more likely to detect tannins.

Boiling grain = cloudy in my opinion.

Curious as to what style you’re shooting for. What you have right now is going to be pretty bitter. I’m calculating an OG around 1.057, SRM ~15, IBU’s ~72 and ABV ~6%.

EDIT:  If you drop the 30 minute addition of NB Hops you’ll get your IBU’s down to ~46 & you’ll have a pretty decent ESB.

As Kai said, go to All-Grain when your process is solid & you’re ready. Cheers!!!

This episode got me started with home brewing and while I now know that some of the lingo is incorrect and that one should avoid boiling the grain I think AB does a good job in introducing the masses to home brewing. Especially since he advocates going to a HBS for supplies.

Pjj2ba, who posted a little on this board has made a AG beer where he boiled all the grain. He reported that the resulting beer was not astringent but had starch haze. Based on literature sources I have read I think that the ~170F sparge temp limit is not to limit tannin extraction as much as it is to prevent complete denaturation of a-amylase. This enzyme is needed to convert any starch that may be released by the rising temp and/or lautering action.  While tannin extraction is facilitated by the higher temp it is not as severe as brewers.

Kai

If you have iodine (iodophor for example) you may add a drop or two to a small sample of that beer. I’d expect it to change color due to the starch haze in the beer. After that discard the sample.

Kai