I tried my first one of these (won’t get into the naming thing) and it had quite a bit of roast character in it. Very creamy brown head, clearly looked like a good amount of black patent in the mash.
I didn’t think that they were supposed to have much in terms of roast, more just colour with hops like a normal IPA but much darker. I can’t say I really liked it that much so I thought I’d ask if sounds. It was Dunham Black IPA from Quebec. Anyway, does this sound right?
I’m not really sure what to tell you. I know some people say “black IPAs” or “Cascadian Dark Ales” aren’t supposed to have roasted character, but other say they are. I don’t really understand the difference between a black IPA and a hop-centric American stout/porter.
Of the commercial versions I’ve tried, some are hoppy with just a hint of roast (Victory Yakima Glory, Otter Creek Alpine Black IPA), some are balanced between roast and hops (Heavy Seas Black Cannon, Widmer Bros Pitch Black). Magic Hat Demo is even more roast-forward, and it’s really more like a hoppy porter to me.
To me the whole India Black vs Porter categorization is sort of like IIPA vs American Barleywine. There is definitely some overlap in the middle.
Some people don’t like it, but I enjoy everything about the combo between roasted malt and hops. I like how the black coffee type bitterness pairs with resiny hop bitterness, and I like how the roast coffee/chocolate flavors pair with citrusy hops.
Agreed. I’ve had a number of commercial black IPAs, some with a schwarzbier-like roastiness and others with a robust stout-like roastiness. If there’s not enough roast, I feel like I’m drinking a regular IPA and wondering why it’s black, but if there’s too much I just taste roast and why wonder it’s called an IPA. Not to say that they can’t be good beers, I’d much rather have a nice American IPA followed by a nice stout.
I like Avery’s New World Porter. They’ve been making that beer since '97, so it’s not like a black IPA is a “new” thing. I’m not sure why adding more of a single ingredient (hops) to what would otherwise be an already established style warrants its own category, when the American-style porter and stout categories have a lot of latitude for the assertiveness of hop character.
I’ve tried a few of the so called Cascadian/India Darks. Personally, I don’t even recognize it as a new “style” and don’t even get me started on the whole naming brewhaha.
Frankly if I want a hoppier dark ale, of all the commercial examples, Sierra Nevada Porter fills that need quite nicely with a very good balance of flavors…and without the silly controversy about the name. ;D
Sublimely Self Righteous Ale, I enjoyed this a lot. Name seems appropriate for this discussion. It just messes with your senses like white chocolate. I think that is what they were going for. Also tied for 25th of Zymurgy’s best beers. So someone else likes it too, for whatever that poll is worth. Taste is completely and entirely subjective. There are lots of beers on that list I wouldn’t drink for free. Does that make them bad- NO- well not necessarily.
[pointless musings] I brewed one expecting it to come out like an IPA with some roasty character and a lot of hoppy resiny piney goodness. It turned out more like a porter with a smidge of additional hops. I’m not sure why this happened, but I was still happy with the beer. If “hitting my target flavor” was the criterion, it was definitely a failure. However, taste wise it was a pleasant surprise, a pretty darn good brew all the same, so it was a success!
Having brewed one, I now think that I really like the style, actually in all its crazy forms. I’ve had multiple commercial versions and they all seem different. It’s a style with lots of room for variation. I will try brewing one again sometime soon. [/pointless musings]
I think this is one beer style where technique plays a big role. I have only brewed a Black IPA once but it was one of my favorite beers. The key I think is adding the dark malts only during the vorlauf and sparge. Gordon Strong talks about this in his book and it is where I got the idea from. I doubt many commercial breweries do this. The dark grains, IMO, really are there to add color and ideally a not whole lot else. The BIPA that I made still had a slight roast to it but it still tasted like an IPA. A pro brewer tasted it and loved it and he even makes a BIPA…if that means anything :
American–Style Black Ale
American-style Black Ales are very dark to black and perceived to have medium high to high hop bitterness,
flavor and aroma with medium-high alcohol content, balanced with a medium body. Fruity, floral and herbal
character from hops of all origins may contribute character. The style is further characterized by a balanced and
moderate degree of caramel malt and dark roasted malt flavor and aroma. High astringency and high degree of
burnt roast malt character should be absent.
Original Gravity (ºPlato): 1.056-1.075 (14-18.2 ºPlato) ● Apparent Extract/Final Gravity (ºPlato): 1.012-
1.018 (3-4.5 ºPlato) ● Alcohol by Weight (Volume): 5-6% (6 -7.5%) ● Bitterness (IBU): 50-70 ● Color SRM
(EBC): 35+ (70+ EBC)