A Return...

Yep, I think it’s safe to say I’m finally about to start again.

And this time, I don’t feel inclined to be technical about my brewing.

When I got into homebrewing, I wanted to brew the best beer. Guinness dry stout, IPAs that were awesome, German Lagers, a Saison to rival Dupont, and so on.

Now that I can afford to drink what I want, I don’t feel inclined to brew that way. Now, I just want to brew for fun. The beer still has to be good, for sure, but why try and brew what I can just buy?

What I’m really thinking of is just brewing simple beers when I feel like it, or more complex beers with friends. I’ve got several who already brew regularly, and a close friend who’s dying to start brewing. During my hiatus, I procured a used MoreBeer Tippy Dump, and have done enough to work the bugs out of it. Just want a second SS Brewtech Brew Bucket (I’ve got a 10 gallon system) and some yeast, and I’m ready to go…

First brew will be a sorta Belgian. Weyermann Barke Munich I, and 3787. Likely some stale Goldings (I have two pounds of them) for a hop. (I still have all my hops…now all stale. Perhaps not a bad thing?)

I understand your views.

Some days I make beers with technology and attention to detail.

Other times I just want to do an easy to brew and easy to drink best bitter.

Both are enjoyable!

But are you making your triumphant return in Baltimore?

Welcome back. I look forward to hearing about/seeing your future brews.  Congrats on the new system. Cheers!

That’s exactly why Drew and I wrote “Simple Homebrewing”.

I just ordered Simple Homebrewing as a reward for a quote about AHA Member Benefits. I am looking forward to it.

I haven’t tried it yet but I brewed the Transatlantic Blonde Ale for Big Brew Day which is from the book.

I just got my copy and started reading it.  I like the easy, conversational style in which it is written…having listened to your podcasts, I can hear your voices in your written words.  I’ll savor it over a few weeks, rather than ripping through it, too!

Thanks!  We try to keep the conversational approach in all of our books, and were lucky that BP was on board with it.

Welcome back to the nut house, Phil.  And thank you, your return – well, the return of your signature at least – has reminded me it’s time to get some nice corn lagers going.  Can just about get one on tap for the 4th if I get on it next weekend.  And I’ll try to keep things RDWHAHB-ish.

I think my idea of simple isn’t what it is for others…

The big thing I won’t be doing is yeast work. I want to avoid starters, I’ve come to realize I hate making them with a passion. Yeast are more a means to an end than a rabbit hole to me now, there’s fun there but just more work than I intend to do.

I still intend to get clear wort into the kettle, and will be utilizing the 3-vessels of course. Will also do decoctions as well.

IOW, more brewing, less brewerania.

Oh, and no whacky hops either.

Whatever works for you is the right thing to do.  Make the best beer possible with the least effort possible while having the most fun possible.

Pretty much. Taking a break from brewing made me realize it’s not the cleaning I hate as much as some of the prep work. Starters in particular. Suddenly have the itch to brew? Too bad, only White Labs on hand and you didn’t make a starter the night before.

Going to be using Wyeast exclusively for liquid yeast, and I’m going to give dry yeast another shot. Still don’t expect US-05 to be any good but I’ll see what else I can find.

I’ve had some really good results with a shaken not stirred starter. Basically, after the brewday is done and the wort is in the fermenter, I mix 1 L water + 100 g DME, boil it, cool it, pitch the yeast and shake the bageezee out of it until foamy. In a cpl hrs it’s at high krausen and ready to pitch about the same time the wort is at pitching temp.

I routinely use 8.5 gal distilled water I buy at the grocery down the street to brew with. I add minerals per Bru’n Water. Three 2.5 gal jugs and One 1 gal jug. After I boil and cool the DME (above), I shake the starter in the 1 gal jug the distilled water came in.

I brew in the morning, finish by lunch, make a starter, pitch yeast by bedtime, with active fermentation the next morning. No stir plate. No day(s) ahead planning. And reuse the same jug the water came in. Easy peasy.

The original text:
Author: S. cerevisiae

All one needs to make a well-shaken starter is a sanitizable vessel that is at least four times the volume of the starter being prepared, a sanitizable screw-on cap for the vessel, and a funnel.  I do not know if anything comparable is available in the UK; however, one U.S.-gallon glass jugs (demijohns in UK speak) are plentiful in the United States.  Home brew supply stores sell plastic replacement caps for these jugs that can be sanitized (38mm polyseal screw top caps).  If one has money to burn, a 5L borosilicate glass media bottle like I currently use is a very nice toy.  However, 5L media bottles can cost prohibitive when purchased new.  I acquired my current 5L media bottle as unused laboratory surplus, and it was not cheap.  I used a 1-gallon glass jug for a very long time before switching over to using a 5L media bottle.

Preparing the starter medium (a.k.a. starter wort)

The starter medium is prepared like one would prepare a starter any other way.  A 10% weight/volume solution is made by mixing 100 grams of pale DME into a little more than 1L of water.  The goal here is to end up with 1L of media after the solution has been boiled and cooled to room temperature.  I boil the solution for 15 minutes in a 3-quart stainless steel sauce pan (A U.S. quart is slightly smaller than a liter).  The media is chilled in the sauce pan with the cover affixed using an ice water bath in my kitchen sink.

Sanitizing the starter vessel, screw-on cap, and funnel

The starter vessel, screw-on cap, and funnel should be sanitized while the medium is boiling and chilling. While I use bleach and StarSan, feel free to use your preferred sanitizer.  It is critical that the funnel is sanitized as well, and that one does not touch the inside surface of the funnel after it has been sanitized.

Note: One thing that I like to teach home brewers is to get into the habit of wiping the lip over which yeast or nutrient will be poured with an alcohol saturated cotton ball before decanting yeast, medium, or supernatant (supernatant is the clear liquid that lies above the solids in a starter, yeast crop, or a batch of beer).  Wild microflora (yeast, mold, and bacteria) rides through the air on house dust.  What we want to do is ensure that we do not drag any dust that may have come to rest on the pouring lip of the container that we are decanting into a vessel in which we intend to grow a culture or ferment a batch of beer.  This precaution makes sense If one thinks about what a nurse or doctor does before giving one an injection.  The reason why a doctor or a nurse cleans an injection site with an alcohol wipe before giving one an injection is to prevent the needle from dragging microflora that is on one’s skin into the injection site.

Pouring the starter medium

After placing the funnel in the starter vessel, one should wipe the pouring lip of the sauce pan in with an alcohol saturated cotton ball before pouring the starter medium into the starter vessel.  I use 70% or 90% isopropyl alcohol.  I used to use 95% ethanol (a.k.a. grain alcohol).  However, my state outlawed its sale due to teenagers and young adults abusing it.  Any 140 proof or better clear spirit will work.  Please do not use methylated spirits.

Inoculating the starter medium

If using a White Labs vial, wipe the pouring lip of the vial with an alcohol saturated cotton ball before pouring the yeast culture into the starter vessel.  If using a Wyeast smack pack, wipe the outside of the smack and the blades of the pair of scissors that one is using to cut a corner off of the smack pack with an alcohol saturated cotton ball before making the cut, and wipe the cut edge of the smack pack with an alcohol saturated cotton ball before pouring the contents of the smack pack into the starter vessel.

Caping and shaking

Here’s where my method differs from the way the average home brewer makes a starter.  The reason why a vessel with a screw-on cap is necessary with this method is because one is going to shake the culture very vigorously for about a minute.  I usually tell brewers to shake the starter vessel like it owes you money (think mafia enforcer).  The goal here is to attempt to turn the media into foam. That’s why the vessel has to be at least four times the volume of the starter.  One should then allow the starter to sit for around thirty minutes before loosening the cap to allow the foam to drop.

A well-shaken starter in a 5L media bottle

Pitching the starter

Pitching is one area where most home brewers get it completely wrong.  A starter is not a small batch of beer.  It is a yeast biomass growth medium.  The goal here is to grow the culture to maximum cell density and then pitch it.  Maximum cell density occurs at high krausen.  Beyond that point, all cell reproduction is for replacement only. Yeast taken at high krausen is much healthier than yeast that is taken from a sedimented starter or batch of beer.  That’s why traditional breweries crop yeast at high krausen.  Allowing a starter to ferment out and settle places the cells in the yeast equivalent of hibernation where they will have to undo survival-related morphological changes that occurred at the end of fermentation as well as completely replenish their ergosterol and unsaturated fatty acid reserves after being pitched.

High krausen should occur within 12 to 18 hours after pitching the starter.  The yeast biomass grows exponentially, not linearly.  The yeast cell count grows at a rate of 2^n, where the symbol “^” means raised to the power of, and n equals the number of minutes that have elapsed since the end of the lag phase divided by 90; hence, the difference in propagation time between 200B cells and 400B cells can be as little as 90 minutes.

British Versus American Pitching Rates

If one believes the yeast calculators found on American sites, one will end up growing 2 to 3 liter starters for 23L batches.  Frankly, the guys who wrote this code know more about coding than they do about yeast.  No two yeast cultures behave the same when pitched, and no two yeast cultures require the same pitching rate.  The only thing that will teach one the proper pitch rate for any given strain is experience with the strain in one’s brew house.  Additionally, it is often desirable to underpitch in order to achieve a desired flavor profile.  British styles benefit from underpitching.  I often pitch as little as 60B cells into 19L of wort when fermenting normal gravity beer (i.e., < 1.065).  Wyeast 1768, which is allegedly Young’s stain, performs much better when pitched at a rate of 3B cells per liter than at a rate of 10B cells per liter when fermenting normal gravity ale.  It produces what I like to refer to as the British lollipop ester when the beer is young.  This strain produces a .delightfully fruity and malty pint when used with a grist that is composed mostly of British pale malt.

If you have access to Imperial’s yeast, get it. 200 billion cells, if fresh, no need for a starter unless you go big.

Used it first  a couple months back.

I honestly don’t think smacking the smack pack gives any significant advantage over,  say, direct pitching White Labs or your old slurry.  No harm either.  S. Cerevisiae posted somewhere that the difference in lag time when pitching half or double the cell count is on the order of 60 to 90 minutes.  So you might do fine pitching two packs of White Labs, or Wyeast, or one of Imperial, or just taking the extra lag time to, you know, have a homebrew… after relaxing and not worrying.  Or try that vitality thing, which I can’t wrap my head around  what real advantage it gives.  (Direct pitching my harvested slurries, my lag time is around half what proponents of vitality starters advertise.  Go figure.)  As for dry yeast, I’ve tried hard to love it.  Better luck to you, dude.  I think you have the right idea about not overstressing on your prep.  But you might still be overthinking it.  Choose where you want to place your effort, and let the beer take care of itself on the rest.

EDIT IOW make wort add yeast.  To paraphrase Denny paraphrasing Fiorello LaGuardia, malt wants to be beer, just try and stop it.

The smack packs just tell you the yeast is alive and well, enough to justify if multiple packs could be used in lieu of a starter.

I used Mark’s SNS start method exlusively, but still hated doing it. My dislike of starters likely isn’t the most rational thing in the world, but it’s still what caused me to cancel brew days more than anything else.

What also might help is that this time I’m not trying to be a production brewery, I still intend to buy most of what I consume. Meaning, I can brew when I feel like it, rather than when the beer is running low.

Keep in mind that you still need to make a starter with Wyeast unless your OG is 1.040 or less

Or pitch extra packs.  A starter is nice for having freshly grown yeast, but if you really don’t want to do it and don’t mind buying extra yeast…  your relaxation and spontaneity is probably worth the $7 or $8.

Agreed.  It just one of those things I forget about since I’ve never done it.

I wonder Phil why you so dislike US-05. From personal experience and from yeast discussions I’ve had with most of the commercial brewers I know, 05 may just be the most reliable, versatile and bulletproof yeast around. Granted that it’s not much good if you’re looking for esters, funk or other yeast produced flavors. I also don’t get the disdain for dry yeast in general so many folks have, other that is than the limited variety available.
  Living in MD you probably don’t have this problem, but here in extreme BFE unless I pay a bunch extra for expedited shipping [overnight here means 3-4 days] the yeast is in transit for at least a week, and about 40% of the time is DOA. The Kolsch I planned to brew yesterday wound up being something unplanned and completely different [after of course the grain was already milled] when the smackpak of WY2565 proved to be a dud, the same thing happened the last time I tried to brew a Kolsch. For some reason, paying as much for the yeast to do a brew as the grain cost me offends my frugal sensibilities.