So, once the boil is over the brewer gets to go home? Or extract brewers don’t actually brew beer? Not sure where you logic comes from, but since the dictionary doesn’t agree with it, I can also see how newbies might not catch the difference.
[quote]brew
v. brewed, brew·ing, brews
v.tr.
To make (ale or beer) from malt and hops by infusion, boiling, and fermentation.
[/quote]
Imagine the backlash is a comp did this. I get friendly ribbing from my club members when I tell them I won a medal in cider when my based is Mott’s apple juice and not freshly pressed, unpasteurized cider. If this was a requirement, my wall would have a lot less medals on it.
Have you considered a drauflassen schedule for your Pilsner if you want more. Brew and pitch into a big fermenter, brew again later that day or the next, and rack the fresh wort in on top. The yeast will have propagated, and will be ready to go with the fresh wort.
As a prolific competition entrant myself, I welcome and encourage all who want to enter into competition to do so, regardless of the brewing system they use.
Absolutely, just didn’t know the real name of it. I remember taking a tour a few years ago of Schlafly’s Bottleworks, they had a 40 (or 30) BBL Brewhouse and 120 BBL fermenters and said they do that. A newer brewery in the KC area does it as well, just to keep up with demand. (He has a 7bbl brewhouse with now 14bbl fermenters.)
It just makes the win that much sweeter. Tongue in cheek, I believe this is why GABF doesn’t allow homebrewers. They dont want to find out that the industry got beat by some redneck with a cooler and a turkey fryer.