So I am thinking that the wit needs to go in the S/H/V category since the pineapple and the dry hops are not very noticeable so the habanero basically makes it a pepper beer.
The lime/lemongrass should then go in specialty since I didn’t use any of the actual fruit?
I had not considered that. This particular beer will be kegged in the next couple of days so I will have to make a judgement call on the strength of the lime/lemograss and consider some aging time as a mellowing factor… I may just go with specialty to be safe since I also have an american wheat that I might enter and would end up in the light hybrid category.
“Some versions may have honey, spices and/or fruit added, although if any of these ingredients are stronger than a background flavor they should be entered in specialty, spiced or fruit beer categories instead.”
If the lime zest and lemon grass is not predominant it might be passed off as the hops so I’d enter that in the blonde category, the other I’d enter in the SFH category. The American wheat you can enter as an American wheat:)
I would enter them both in specialty. Though I would only do so if you say those ingredients are in there and you can smell/taste them. Be descriptive of the beer. If it’s a subtle pineapple… say subtle pineapple. It shouldn’t matter but it does. It lets the judges that think, if it has an ingredient listed it needs to be over the top, know that you’re going to subtle.
I’d put spicy pineapple wit in Fruit and Spice, 29B and the other in SHV, 30A with the usual caveat about balance between “specialty” ingredients and the base beer.
2008 guidelines? pepper/pineapple wit in 16E, and the other in SHV 21A.
Well I am a bit confused now. I think I can only have one entry per category so entering both in 23 is not an option. It appears that they are using 2008 guidelines however are grouping most subcategories together; 16A-E will be one category.
After clicking around, it appears that this may not be BJCP sanctioned this year although they are using the guidelines. I will have to investigate.
basically you try to find a home for something elsewhere until 23 is the only option. One beer has nothing but spices and herbs. Both are flavoring the blonde base, not providing any sugar like a fruit. So, 21A
Treat Belgians like any other style - find a home for them elsewhere, and then if nothing fits, treat 16E as the Belgian version of 23.
Robust Porter with raspberry = 20A. Robust Porter with jalapeno = 21A. Robust Porter with both = 23.
Witbier with pineapple = 20A. Witbier with habanero = 21A. Witbier with both = 16E.
if the base beer was already a Belgian specialty, then adding fruit/spices/both to it and it is still a 16E.
it happens all the time; don’t feel bad. There were a half dozen beers in the NHC finals in Cat 23 that could have gone in 21A. Good judges will still judge them (A peanut butter and chocolate stout almost won the bronze medal), but if there’s an obvious better place for it (based on taste, not ingredient list) then they should mention it.
efforts have been made to reduce confusion and find homes for things in the new guidelines. I’ve seen some bemoaning the scope of the changes and size of the guidelines; well things like this are one reason why they are that way.