My next brew will be a Dunkel Weizen. I plan to use a Decoction Mash in the interest of tradition - my first. I plan for Protein, Beta, Alpha rests, and Mash out. Any advice, or pitfall avoidance from the more initiated?
Interestingly enough on today’s malts protein rests and decoction’s are no longer very traditional. My understanding is not very many German breweries bother with decoction mashing any longer. It’s too expensive and unecessary.
I think everyone should try a decoction at least once and find out for themselves if it makes a difference or not. Personally I think if its done properly it makes great beer. I brew all my Lagers with a single decoction called the Schmitz process, it cuts a lot of time off a traditional double or triple decoction but gives similar results.
If you are using an undermodified pils in that beer you might want to perform a protein rest (at least a short one) but otherwise I agree that you can do without the protein rest.
If I’m low I just run some wort into my kettle, bring it to a near boil and add it back to MT. And I totally agree everyone should try it. It’s really not that bad.
I’ve been under the impression that decoction was a technique designed for mash temperature control in the days before the availability of accurate thermometers. Do you think it may add something to the beer beyond this? Or do you think it’s just an interesting technique that’s worth trying, but has been supplanted by Thermapens?
Slightly on topic… I was at a newer Dallas Brewery last night for a club meeting. The brewer mentioned that they purposely use under modified base malts and run through step mashes as they find it produces a superior end product. Maybe there is some truth to this akin to Coke with sugar v. Coke with corn syrup. Nothing drastic, just that certain jean es se qua.
Since I have never done a side by side batch with decoction vs non decoction I can’t really comment as to the flavor. But I will say that decoction definitely increases your efficiency. Is it worth the extra time and energy? Hell no.
^^^ I remember the first time I tried it, I was excited that I’d just made this incredible BoPils, except that I couldn’t find much difference. Probably wouldn’t do it again. Never say never though.
Has anything changed it at all, Denny ? In honesty, I tried it twice. But the extra hours didn’t seem to net me noticeably better beer. If I felt like it did, I’d do it regardless. I like to think my palate is pretty good.
Nope. Now admittedly I almost never do the blind triangle any more when I do decoctions. I simply brew my standard German pils recipe and see if there’s anything about the decocted version that I don’t recall from the single infusion. Probably not the best way to do things. But I’m with you…the corollary to my “make the best beer possible with the least effort possible while having the most fun possible” is “do anything it takes to make better beer, but be sure what you;re doing actually makes better beer”. If I truly thought a decoction would make the beer better, I’d do it.
I like the melanoidins that are created in a decoction mash. They are particularly welcome in Munich Helles, Oktoberfest, Munich Dunkel & Bock Bier. Now I’m a plenty lazy brewer, I skip the whole temperature step mash in favor of a single infusion rest for 60 minutes then pull a single decoction for mashout. For me it’s the most efficient way to achieve the desirable melanoidin flavors without too much extra work.