What is the difference between Biscuit, Victory, and Amber Malts?
They all seem to say that they lend a warm bread, biscuity malt flavor and aroma.
Are they the same thing or are they distinctly different?
Biscuit and Victory are similar to me; Amber is darker and more intense. Sort of like Dark Munich vs. Light Munich. They are all used for similar reasons.
Are Biscuit and Victory malts more crystal (stewed and kilned) types of malt and the Amber malt more of a base malt (just kilned)?
The color ranges reported in ProMash show that Amber and Victory are more similar in color and Biscuit is lighter than either. If the information above is correct (crystal vs base), then maybe that’s the reason Gordon’s observations are correct.
Biscuit (Belgian, Dingemans) seems to be “fully toasted, lightly roasted” around 350F, resulting in 18-27 degrees Lovibond, and containing no enzymes (must be mashed). It does not appear to be stewed, i.e., a crystal/caramel malt. Some say “Saltine Crackers” character and adds amber color to the beer.
Amber malt (UK, Fawcett) is a more “strongly toasted, slightly roasted” form of pale malt, kilned at temperatures of 150-160 °C, resulting in 30-42 degrees Lovibond (22 SRM). and containing no (or very low) enzymes (must be mashed). Amber malt has an intense, bitter “roasty” or “dry toffee” flavor which mellows on aging. Helps to balance with crystal and caramel malts. Low grain bill percentages (2-5% max) recommended due to intensity and color contributions.
That makes sense based on what I see. Amber malt just looks darker. It has a reddish color. The others are more dark tan.
I sub biscuit and victory like I sub aromatic and melanoidin. I’ll go with the right maltster for the country of origin for the beer by choice, otherwise pick what’s available.
I mash all of them, but I think you can steep them all in lower quantities if you just want the flavor contribution and not the gravity. Seems a bit dodgy to me, but then again I mash everything that isn’t a crystal or roasted malt.
Depends on the style. I’ve done both. I’ve also cold-steeped the dark grains and added them later in/after the boil. I’ve also added them at vorlauf. Crystal and roast don’t need to be mashed, so only do it if you want to save time/effort and/or like all the flavors (good and bad) they may give, as well as what they may do to your mash pH.
Think about it. When you make extract beer, which grains do you steep? If you (or someone else) aren’t mashing them when you make extract beer, there’s no need to do it in all-grain. You’re doing it by choice. As long as you understand what you gain and lose with that choice, then you can decide how to use them.
Ever work some place where the coffee sits on a hot plate? Ever taste it when it’s fresh, and then when it’s been sitting there for an hour? Notice a difference?
As Gordon points out, crystal and roast affect mash pH strongly through their elevated acidity. I want to point out that this steeping approach is a good way to go with these grains when you have low alkalinity water and the mash pH would drop too low if you included those grains in with the rest of the mash.
So RO and distilled water brewers, consider this approach to brewing beers with large percentages of these steepable grains and you probably won’t have to resort to adding alkalinity to your mashing water. Bru’n Water gives you the tools needed to figure out if deleting those grains will keep your mash pH in the right range when brewing with RO or distilled water.
Darn. I’ve been merrily mashing everything, because I could, and using the Brew-Taste the results-Rinse-Repeat Method. I guess I’ll have to read Brewing Better Beer further. Nevertheless, so far the results have been very drinkable.
Will have to try this to compare Just bought Modern Homebrew Recipes, really lookin’ forward to trying out your recipes :o Any particular favorites you’d start with Gordon? Cheers, Dan.
OK, so does anybody know if there is a flow-chart that shows the basic malting paths in one chart?
I don’t imagine I’m the first to think of this. I feel like that might be a really neat resource, but I’m having trouble locating what I’m looking for.