I don’t brew English styles at all. I am thinking Amber Bitter but maybe bumping up the SO4. This isn’t really an ESB but the idea for it is based on an ESB I suppose. Any feedback?
I feel like you could pick your poison anywhere from about 100-300ppm so4, based on your liking and experience with previous brews. I, personally, don’t enjoy the drying effect beyond ~200ppm for standard gravity ales, and usually opt for about 125-150ppm so4 to keep things moderate. If I’m going for a lightly minerally profile with some drying on the tongue then I’ll push to ~200ppm. This would be the case for beers in the 4-6% abv range that do not finish sweet.
IIPAs (I know it’s OT), for me, can handle more so4 due to the sweetness from the amount of malt and the hop character, which “pairs” well with the drying effect and mineral quality. IMO, of course.
Thanks. I believe Amber bitter falls at 110 ppm so I may bump it up to 150 or so. I have been doing APA at 200-225 which this beer could handle as well I suppose. It may just come down to what I decide to do when I brew on Sunday.
Yeah this is a collaboration type brew with a buddy. It’s mostly UK ingredients but we decided on US05 for yeast and more of an American type hop schedule (I think?). I am using a lot of ingredients that I am not familiar with so I don’t really know what to expect or how good it will be.
I’m the last person to be a stickler for style, but you brewed an American Pale Ale with UK malts. British ale yeast is the hallmark of ESB character, and it’s not really going to be recognizable as an ESB with US-05 (or American hops)
As far as the water profile goes, most ESB’s have at least a moderate minerality. I think 200-300ppm of sulfate is what you need to really capture that authentic flavor. Of course, I’d rather brew to my tastes and keep it at 150ppm of sulfate, with about 80-100ppm of chloride.
I agree that a sulfate level in the 150 to 300 ppm range would be preferred in an ESB. I would avoid the upper end for this style since my perceptions are that most British ESBs don’t dry out their finish excessively. Keeping the chloride around 50 ppm is fine, but if you are looking for a more minerally flavor, boosting the chloride over 100 ppm is needed.
Mineral levels in British bitters are quite a bit higher than levels US brewers tend to use. See link below for levels recommended for strong bitter by Murphy&Son, the main testing lab advising British breweries on water treatment.
Thanks for the help. I didn’t check the thread this morning otherwise I probably would have bumped the minerals up.
Ended up with
Ca 90
Mg 7
Na 14
SO4 150
Cl 50
As noted this is basically an APA with uk ingredients. I used a bit of palisade hops and us05 which Americanized it. The hydrometer sample definitely had a grassy/earthy/tea hop character which was interesting since I haven’t really used English hops before.
My bad, I misread your post to mean that you had used American hops as well. I actually like a small amount of US hops to compliment the UK varieties in an ESB. Centennial, Meridian and Caliente have all done really well for me alongside EKG’s.
I’ve gotta say it: I don’t think overly mineral-rich water improves English beers or hoppy beers. Having done extensive experimentation on this, my palate prefers beers with 50-150 ppm Calcium and a balanced 50-100 ppm Chloride and 50-100 ppm Sulfate. With maltier beers, I will favor Chloride to Sulfate 2-1 and with hoppier beers, I will favor sulfate to chloride 3-2.
I have had a lot of real ale in England and I don’t think they are all using highly mineral-rich water, either. When I taste a homebrewed bitter or an IPA that is too rich in sulfate, I invariably find it harsh and my sulfate-rich beers have been marked down for “harshness” and “astringency” by competition judges. I just don’t think it improves things to go overboard in minerals, even if it may be more historically accurate. For my mouth, having 50 ppm calcium and good pH is what matters.
No worries. When I mentioned ‘American hop schedule’ I can see where that caused confusion. I mainly meant that it is hopped more like an APA as far as addition times and amounts. So yes, this is basically an APA with UK malt and hops. I find the palisade hops to be englishy with some grassy notes and light stone fruit qualities.
Not all English waters are highly mineralized. There are areas with Pilsen quality water. I think some of the reason for the recommendations that Charles pointed out, was that the brewery water treatment firm he cited also sells products that will end up mineralizing the water with high SO4 and Cl. Their AMS product is a mixture of hydrochloric and sulfuric acids and that can result in high SO4 and Cl levels when neutralizing high alkalinity. Their recommendations are probably skewed by that reality.
I appreciate someone piping up with that opinion. When I brought this up on one of the English homebrewing forums I sometimes visit, I was severely lambasted as an unknowing Yank…unfamiliar with their tradition. As Skyler points out, any of us can test out high mineralization at any time. Most of us have found that more modest levels do tend to create better beer.
PS: Try dosing minerals in the glass first. That will help you find your desired mineralization without wasting a batch.