Bob - You reminded me about the Fermonster, Thanks. I had forgotten about them - don’t shop on MoreBeer all that much anymore. I like the Fermonster - you summed up the benefits well. I also like that they use #10 stoppers since I have a bunch from my BetterBottles. I need to order some keezer parts from MoreBeer anyway. Now to decide on the 6 or 7 gallon. I’ll probably go with the 7 gallon - space is nice and it’s only a dollar more.
I have 2 problems with conicals, both related to cost. I frequently have 3-5 batches fermenting at a time and that many conicals would be expensive. As would a way to control fermemtation temp.
For the first time ever this past Spring I had 4 beers in fermenters at one time. Two 6.5 gallon glass carboys and 2 buckets. I’ve always liked the glass but am very, very, careful with them.
The buckets work well but I always feel like I’m fighting the lids when I have open them. I know that is a kind of whiny reason but it’s mine.
I also admit to enjoying lifting the covers on my glass carboys and being able to see the activity. It’s easy and convenient to see how the process is going without have to fight to get the lid off. I’m apparently too cheap (or forgetful) to buy the lid removal tool. I don’t dry hop very often so the narrow neck isn’t much of a problem for me.
Certainly does. The bucket I use for sanitizer takes a good pry to pull off using my knee as a leverage point as well as to hold it down. Others are much easier to pull off little by little or in one go.
I still like the better bottle knock-off made by northern brewer. They fit a#10 bung and are $25. I swap them out every 2-3 yrs when I see them looking suspect or when they are BOGO.
I have a couple bigmouth bubblers first gen. but not happy with their seal. I hear the the EVO 2 are pretty nice.
I have only used buckets for primary fermentation, and then go to either my glass carboy or Better Bottle for secondary. The glass is such a PIA I’m thinking about ditching it and it sure doesn’t help my back much.
I also wonder if secondary is really worth the hassle? I typically brew IPA’s the most. What’s the consensus on transferring?
If you’re not adding fruit or bulk aging, secondary just serves no purpose. It’s outdated advice that still persists in brew shops and in ingredient kits. And racking to secondary also gives you another opportunity to introduce infection into your beer. Autolysis from leaving the beer on the yeast too long isn’t a concern for over 6 weeks, so I say leave it in primary until you keg/bottle.
I haven’t done a secondary in years. I was relieved years ago when I came to this forum that I was not the only one.
I’ve got BBs that are at least 10 years old. Treat them right and you won’t need to replace them for a long time. No bottle brushes, only a good soak and a rag when needed.
The last several posts seem to be arguing for a conical, without realizing that they are. You can in essence do a primary and secondary fermentation without racking to a second vessel, which was always a concern for me in the past. The “neck” opening is about 6" which is plenty for anything short of a football which you might desire to stuff in there. And even the faulty ones seal up better than a bucket. I don’t think that the cost is all that significant compared to a bucket which is specifically sold as a fermenter, but we all have different financial situations.
The only serious downside I have encountered is the vertical dimension, a carboy or bucket will fit into a much shorter space than one of those damned tall conicals. Also you can’t see what’s going on inside the fermenter as well as you could with glass [yes, I too enjoyed the lava lamp comment]. Just so you don’t get the impression I’m on the payroll of the manufacturer, there are a number of things I would very much like to see them spend a few bucks improving. A clear viewport in the lid to monitor the process, better seals at the lid to body and the ferm-loc hole, altering the casting mold so the thermometer shaft is parallel to the ground rather than perpendicular to the angle of the fermenter wall, clear trub balls, and an option for a smaller trub ball are the ones I’d most like to see. I’m not holding my breath while waiting for the manufacturer to do the right thing and improve their product. Sooner or later though, if they don’t someone else will.
One of the other posters mentioned that he had problems with the conical plugging up. I haven’t encountered that problem - yet. This morning I finally remembered to dump the trub ball on a batch of stout - about 3 days late. The ball was completely full of yeast sediment [a first] and there was about 3 1/2 " of additional sediment in the bottom of the cone. I removed, dumped, sanitized, and replaced the trub ball, opened the valve at the bottom of the cone, and after a few healthy “glugs” all the yeast sediment in the bottom of the cone moved into it’s new quarters in the junk ball.
I have minor issues with the Fast Ferment units and would go with another brand in a hot second if a better option becomes available, because I think FF has gone low budget on a few things, but at the moment you couldn’t pay me enough to go back to buckets or switch to carboys.
FWIW.
Speidel buckets seem to be holding up better than my regular plastic buckets so far. The sturdy paint bucket style plastic fermentation vessels seem to get stress cracks. At my house they do anyway. The handles are very sturdy, but they are VERY tall
I use a plastic jerrycan
I “no chill” so hot wort goes straight from the kettle into this. I then leave it in a bin full of cold water until its cold and then pitch yeast directly into it.
I leave headspace which i fill with O2 and shake like it owes me money. Cap with a 45mm silicone bung and airlock. ferment, crash, rack with a syphon and clean with hot PBW soak. I store them with a little peracetic acid to keep them bug - free.
Works a treat and costs about 10 bucks in your money.
cheers
steve