Final gravity and moutfeel

If you check your final gravity with a hydrometer, then the reading describes the density of the beer, right? Does density correlate with mouthfeel? If so, imagine you have two beers, both finishing at 1.012, but one had a starting gravity of 1.045 and the other was 1.065. Would these beers basically have the same mouthfeel?

I would say that gravity is only part of it. Mouthfeel is affected by ingredients like oats, flaked barley, rye or differing amounts of hops as well as the degree of carbonation and probably much more.

I don’t think there is a significantly useful correlation between FG and mouthfeel except in nearly identical beers. As Al says there are many other factors contributing.

I have made saisons with an FG hovering right around 1 (sometimes under 1) that have great big rich mouthfeel and I’ve made Scottish 60/- with FG in the 1.010+ range that feel pretty thin.

Carbonation makes a huge difference as do other factors such as ingredients.

You can measure lots of stuff about your beer with instruments but the only instrument that really matters is your taste buds.

For two identical recipes that finish at different gravities, and are carbonated to the same level, then I’d imagine that there would be some correlation between mouthfeel and gravity. Otherwise, there are too many other factors at play. Mort’s example of a Saison is a perfect example. WY3711 will finish in the low single digits, but has a remarkably full (but not heavy), juicy mouthfeel. Flaked barley or oats in a stout is another example of adding body without gravity points.

FG is really only useful information within the context of a particular recipe.

+1 to all of the above, especially CO2 vols.

FG is important to me to measure attenuation, but as said mouthfeel is more recipe/grist dependent.

Yeast and fermentation play a role as well. I’m always chasing a particular mouthfeel I get from certain Belgian and English ales. That’s part of the obsession I suppose.

for sure. I had the Diue de Ciel wit beer a year ago and have been trying to get the silky mouthfeel ever since. I can’t seem to get it with flaked adjuncts alone which leads me to believe it’s in part the yeast. Course now I can’t find that beer around here anymore so I can’t steal the yeast!

Yeast play a big role for sure.  WY3711 is a great example.

I would argue that mash temp can influence mouthfeel as well.

I think FG influences body more than mouthfeel.

Also consider beta-glucans.  Less modified malts (like Belgian styles), oats, etc. will add beta-glucans and really ramp up the viscosity of a beer.

There seems to be confusion here between body and mouthfeel.

How do you distinguish the two things Denny?

From the BJCP Study Guide…

“The body of a beer is characterized as its fullness, viscosity, or thickness on the tongue and palate;
descriptors range from watery or characterless to satiating or thick. Body is a component of mouthfeel,
which encompasses physical sensations such as astringency, alcoholic warmth and carbonation; the
combination of all those components determines how the beer stimulates the palate. The body is
determined by the levels of dextrins and medium-length proteins. Lack of dextrins is caused by low
saccharification temperatures, excessive use of adjuncts or by highly attenuative yeast strains. A low
protein level may be caused by excessively long protein rests, excessive fining or the addition of large
amounts of fermentable sugars. Light body is appropriate in American light lagers and lambics, but not
in strongly malt-accented styles such as barleywines, Scotch ales, and doppelbocks.”

That’s the take-away. Thanks for sharing that Denny.

cool so a more nuanced answer for the OP is that while FG does affect Body to some degree there are still other components of Body that have major effects. Additionally as Body is only one component of Mouthfeel it would be even less comprehensive to use FG as a measure of Mouthfeel.

Well said Mort.  Thanks for the refresher Denny !

Mouth feel is the driving force in the universe, basically the whole reason any of us exist. Or is it hyperbole? I get the two mixed up sometimes

:D    That’s what I hear.

Yes, this is right. Everyone says it’s true.