How do you know they’re on the high side? Have you had them analyzed? How do you know what you’re detecting is actually IBUs? See what I’m getting at?
I have use the Grainfather recipe calculator, at least partly because it implements the mIBU formula. I have found that to more accurately reflect the actual bitterness. But until you have your beers analyzed to confirm your perceptions, you’re shooting in the dark.
No, never had any beers analyzed. But in a direct comparison of a commercial brewed Helles, mine was substantially higher IBU. My 5D is quite bitter too, certainly on the high end of the scale. More bitter than I recall any of the beers on draft in Mainz and Frankfurt.
Living in North Texas, the elevation is around 700 feet above sea level. We do factor that in.
The beer brewed with the following recipe is quite good. It hits the marks in the BJCP guidelines for a 5D. But the bitterness, while not off-putting, is a tad on the high side based on my personal taste.
Like the above article stated, I guess an adjustment will have to be made, based on my past experience.
Water:
Ca = 40
CaCO3 = 99
Mg = 4
SO4 = 56
Total Hardness = 117
Total Alkalinity = 92
Mash -
Double decoction
Mash in at 139 for 30 minutes
1st decoc 5 minute boil - now 152 for 15 minutes
2nd decoc 5 minute boil - now 162 for 20 minutes
Mash out @ 170
8 gallons mash water, filtered city tap.
9 gallons sparge water, filtered city tap.
Hops - IBU target 39
3.8 oz Tetnanger 5.9% AA (90 minutes)
90 minute boil
The wort is rapidly chilled, getting to 100 F in about 15 minutes, and to 70 in about 45 minutes. But the wort is not run off until a good well defined cold-break is apparent. This may take an hour total time. Sometimes a little longer, summertime. At the end of chilling, the wort is brilliant clear, and the cold-break and all proteins get filtered out in the hop bed (whole cone hops).
I’ll just add that the IBU calculators are not correct. They were based on whole cone hops which doesn’t translate directly to pellets. …but it’s what we have so we use them. Several articles have been written describing this.
Also, like water profile calculators, I believe they’re meant to get you in the ballpark. Brew, adjust, rebrew, adjust, rebrew, adjust…. Rarely have I ever brewed a beer and didn’t want to make adjustments.
Someone mentioned an experiment we did on the podcast. 15-20 brewers sent in beer theyd brewed for analysis. We found a range of around +/- 50% on actual IBUs compared to predicted IBU. There are a range of variables that can account for that. For instance, when we talked to Glenn Tinseth about how he came up with his formula, he said that things like kettle geometry, cooling time, and even the form of the hops could cause results to vary from what he found.
Many, if not most,commercial breweries calculate custom utilization curves based on their real world equipment and practices. Once you have an analysis for a few batches, you can make similar adjustments.
Hmm. I see no acid addition. With so much pilsner malt with very little specialty malt, and somewhat alkaline water source, your mash pH could be quite high about 5.8 or maybe even higher. This could lead to additional extraction of tannins, phenols, etc. So then your bitterness might not be so much from IBUs as from some other unwanted extracted thing. I’d aim for mash pH closer to 5.5-5.6 (as measured at room temperature).
Are the IBU numbers commercial breweries report accurate? Are they required to report a measured number or do they use the same equations we do and report an estimate (say from Tinseth)?
I compare my bitterness to packaged commercial beer. I am not sure if the numbers from Tinseth are exactly accurate but I think they are consistent and therefore useful.
I use Brewer’s Friend and find that it consistently gets me into a range that seems within style expectations but often not exactly what suits my taste. If I brew the same recipe or similar with the same hops and adjust either boil time or amount I can get pretty close to what I had hoped to acheive. I cannot recall the calculator ever seeming way off to my perception.
Exactly. Alkaline water will enhance bitterness, but not in a good way. High pH at pitch can lead to higher pH in the finish. Your lager should land at 4.2-4.3 in the finish beer. Higher finish pH will lead to a higher perceived bitterness. The lab report will give you some information and may or may not be useful, but in the end the human palate rules the roost.
Often homebrewers will get the pH right in the mash and never check it at pitch, it almost always rises after sparging even with RO water. Your pitching pH should be 5.1-5.2 ideally. A mash pH of 5.4 is great for mashing, but too high for the pitch.
Edit: The way to test if the pH is too high is to pour a half a glass or so and add 88% lactic or 85% phosphoric acid one drop at a time with a tooth pick. Taste it after each drop and note the bitterness. When you taste the acid you can stop. If the bitterness drops, it’s likely your pH is too high in the finished beer.
Even if they were correct, there is more to bitterness than IBUs, as Dave pointed out. The IBU measurement is nice because it is well-defined and quantitative, but there is a whole lot more to the story than meets the optical absorption device.