Unfortunately, after thinking about those rules for a day and doing some math in my head, I’ve decided that most of the tiebreakers will be almost useless under this year’s entry limits. Not completely useless, but almost. For example, the last one about tallying total first round entries - most will be entering the similar numbers of beers this year.
I agree it’s a fine tiebreaker. But this year the other will not have sent 13. Far more likely to have 4 golds each, and they each sent the max of 5 beers.
Edit: If you send 5 beers to NHC and win 4 gold medals, you’re OK in my book.
we haven’t heard any numbers, but from previous interest levels it feels more like we’ll have three people tied with two silver medals out of the max of 3 entries…
it could still work out though, and it is what it is. A victim of our hobby’s awesomeness/growth.
I will say that I’d like to see any random selection methods avoided at all costs. if it comes down to that, I’d give it to the person who won the biggest categories before I’d flip a coin. I have less problem with steel cage matches. ;D
I agree. Winning by a coin toss will take away some of the coolness. If I were the winner, I’d rather they just declare it a tie. Or at least recognize all the tied winners and use the coin toss to pick who gets the trophy, but officially call it a tie. It’ll work out - in the end we’re all making beer!
I see 23 largely bearded and carrying a few extra lbs homebrewers on stage tied for first place. Janis turns around and throws the Ninkasi bouquet over her shoulder; hilarity ensues.
I think it’s cool that someone can enter 1 beer in the first round and potentially win Ninkasi as well as Homebrewer of the Year. Maybe that should be the new goal, winning more with less
I know 1 person so far that has received email, I also know other people from same region who did not receive it yet. Based on my small data set I’ll speculate that people with last names starting with A received their email and every hour another letter should go out.