I’ve noticed your tag line several times, and I’m just curious. Knowing you the bit that I do, I’m sure you have a reason, and I’d like to learn what it is.
I posted the question as a thread rather than message you because I anticipate that I’ll learn something, and if that’s the case other may as well. Thanks in advance.
I am sorry to disappoint you, but it’s a personal preference. Crystal malt screams “artificially flavored” to my taste buds. It’s the craft beer equivalent of using caramel coloring in American Dark Lager.
Keith you and I have been around for a while, so we know why crystal malt is overused in craft and home brewing; namely, the lack of quality extract and base malts in the early days of the movement (i.e., the amateur brewers of yesteryear are the craft brewers of today). Back in the bad old days, crystal malt was used to doctor less than fresh extract and to add flavor to the major base malt that was available to amateur brewers; namely, American 2-row, which, in my humble opinion, is the Melba toast/tofu of the 2-row world. Somehow, that work around morphed into standard practice after the base malts that amateur and early craft brewers were attempting to simulate became available.
Crystal malt is simply a tool in the toolbox. I use whatever amount of whatever malt I need to get the results I want. I don’t throw away a perfectly good hammer just because I have a screwdriver that can be used to drive nails.
I brew a lot of Belgian style ales without crystal malt, and they usually come out really well. However, I like a decent charge of British medium and/or dark crystal in my bitters, APAs and IPAs (though it’s definitely against trend in IPA brewing right now).
I’ll get sick of either one if I brew or drink too much of it, but I prefer IPAs in the vein of SN Celebration to Stone IPA.
The British stuff tastes a lot better to me than the Briess caramel malts (I stopped using those a couple of years ago).
I guess the simplest explanation would be that with less husk material, it’s a little harder to overdo it with a 2-row malt. Or maybe the precursor sugars are different, and so are the actual Maillard products.
A lot of it probably comes down to getting a less consistent (and more complex) product from a smaller maltster. A Briess or Cargill or GW 60L crystal, for example, gives off what I think of a cloying, overpowering caramel flavor when used in quantity. But I regularly use 5-8% UK crystal malt that’s labeled the same color, but is really more of a spectrum.
I’m not a crystal hater, but I am a ‘crystal limiter’. I too started brewing back when healthy amounts of crystal were put into nearly everything. And I agree that it probably covered a multitude of sins, in terms of the quality of some of the ingredients. I usually limit it to no more than 8%, less for IPAs (~ 5-6%).
I find that (for my tastes) using 25-40+% Munich accomplishes for me what I always wanted from crystal, ie., malty richness without the ‘caramelly’ sweetness. I do like crystal in American amber, as well as porters and stouts. And I agree it is a tool to keep in the toolbox. But gotta say, these ‘over-crystal malted’ AIPAs and IIPAs are killing me - I can hardly buy a new IPA without first hearing a positive review from a friend. Excess caramel sweetness and American hops are a combo that I’m disliking more and more.
This is the conversation I was hoping for. I have heard smattering comments about the overuse of crystal malts for some time, and was curious.
I have yet to taste a beer that I thought was too sweet, but I have a sweet tooth for sure. Often what makes any recipe pop for me is adding either sugar or salt. Doubtless I am a typical American conditioned to lots of both… and I’m OK with that until the Doc says I’m not.
My latest IPA had 9.2% Crystal 30 and I like it. Perhaps when my palate gets more educated I’ll start agreeing. When Denny was in town I asked him to evaluate a couple of beers. He tasted this IPA and didn’t mention too much crystal… but he is a very nice guy.
That’s cool he got to try a couple! The best part is that nobody is right or wrong here - I love that we can all trade info, debate (or whatever) and still make our beer just the way we want. I like to gather all the info I can about other peoples methods, even if it doesn’t change mine.
My palate has changed a lot since I’ve been homebrewing, I’m sure it will continue, so it’s possible that I’ll come to prefer less crystal. But the other side of this conversation is that I don’t make beer just for me. I want everyone to enjoy it.
I don’t hate crystal malts at all. I use them in many of my beers to get the flavor and body that I want. I remember the brewers from Founders talking at NHC and they said that they use a lot of crystal in their all day IPA (session IPA). They said that the amount of crystal that they use goes against every thing that you read on the internet. Even though I don’t care too much for that beer, it doesn’t taste too sweet or artifical to me. Anyway, today I’m not using any crystal in a Belgian Pale Ale.
I guess I always thought it was because homebrewers had a tendency to think craft beer should have a lot of body, so they always mashed higher and added too much crystal malt.
I also always thought it was because most brewers start off as extract brewers and they want to use some real grain in the process and since crystal malt doesn’t have to be mashed that it was called for in every reciep and carried over to all grain.
Hey, so do I! I’m not saying it can’t be done. Depends on how you use it. But most of the times I don’t think a beer needs over 5% crystal malt.
I’m not saying stay away from crystal malt I just think it has tended to be over used in the past - and it seems like novice brewers tend to throw it in everything.
If you like it, that part of the discussion is ended. My favorite part of all this is being able to get beer that tastes the way I want it.
That said, this made me go back through my logs. Based almost purely on my reading in this forum, I’ve gone from my first recipe being 11% crystal to my most recent being 4% plus 12% Munich. And I feel like every batch is better than the one before. If anything, I’ll up the Munich in the future.
To my palate, the over-use of hops is at least as big a problem as the overuse of crystal. I’m getting real tired of going into a shop or bar and seeing half the offerings be 90 IBU IPAs. It’s a big world out there, and I want to taste more of it.
As Denny says, just a tool and use it for the right application. I will be a contrarian and say that Maris Otter is over used. It doesn’t belong in everything.
The cool thing about brewing is that you can do whatever you want. If you want a 100% crystal 120 beer, go for it. You might need to pitch brett lacto and pedio and give it a year or two to finish, but dont let anyone tell you you cant.
If you hate crystal and all people who use it, well cool. Its your beer, your palate, your opinion. Rock it!
The trick is when we confuse experimental or personal tastes with brewing to style. The conversation usually goes like this. “My IPA has 15% crystal 10.” ---- “You dont want to use more than 5%” or “You can’t use that much crystal.”
How do we know what someone we’ve never met wants? And what law says they can’t? Maybe, typically they dont… or, if you’re brewing to style that might…
Anyway, if someone hates crystal thats fine by me. You can still be my friend, so long as you don’t use carapils. People who use carapils are evil and should be banned.