So I have been reading a bunch of posts from another forum about not ever racking to a second fermentor. They claim to get the best beer when they leave it in primary for a month and then bottle. They are talking about flavor and clarity. I was going to rack to a Carboy in a few days but not sure. They had some good arguments. Thoughts?
I almost never use a secondary any more. If you’re an AHA member you can access the Ask the Experts area of the website and see what John Palmer has to say about it (http://www.homebrewersassociation.org/pages/lets-brew/ask-the-experts/john-palmer?cid=wr6B8CL9lj0q%2BJT6ImywRQ%3D%3D&redirect=http://www.homebrewersassociation.org/pages/lets-brew/ask-the-experts/john-palmer), but here’s an excerpt…
“I, and Jamil and White Labs and Wyeast Labs, do not recommend racking to a secondary fermenter for ANY ale, except when conducting an actual second fermentation, such as adding fruit or souring. Racking to prevent autolysis is not necessary, and therefore the risk of oxidation is completely avoidable. Even lagers do not require racking to a second fermenter before lagering.”
I crash cool in the primary, then straight to the keg.
Fair enough. This forum is great.
Not needed. Straight to the keg. I’d also be leery of leaving your ale on the yeast for a month. You can do it but for most beers 14 days are plenty.
Except for the exceptions mentioned earlier, secondary isn’t necessary. I’ve left ale in primary for two months with no ill effects.
No secondary for me either. However, I do find the new mantra of leaving it in primary for 4-6 weeks to be just as silly and unnecessary.
+1 And I have experienced problems by leaving beer in primary for over a month in the 70’s temp range. If I were to park a beer for some ungodly reason in primary it would be at cold temps.
I’ve even seen autolysis with a saison- the beer turned dark and smelled meaty and rank after five weeks on the yeast at room temp.
I’ve gotten lazy and left ales on a cake for 8 weeks plus without any problem. If problems do arise, I would check my sanitation or yeast health.
That said, if I want a really clear beer in a short period of time, I’ll use a secondary. Nothing wrong with it.
Can the yeast cake still strip hop essential oils and stuff from the beer even after floculation? Seems like a secondary would be useful for dry-hopping…
+1. Me too.
A secondary is a great way to DH. You can harvest your yeast from the primary and in the end you’ll get clearer beer.
Crash cool and keg here too
Even dry hop in Primary, since I’m not reusing the yeast.
Maybe if you ware planning a long conditioning period it is worth it.
If you keg there is really no need to use a second carboy as a secondary. The keg serves as a far better secondary (or bright tank) because you can purge it completely with Co2. You can then either blow the yeast out through the dip tube or, if you want to be sure the beer is completely clear so that the sediment doesn’t stir up when you move the beer, rack the beer to another keg via a jumper. A shortened dip tube on the secondary or bright tank keg can help you leave the yeast behind.
If you bottle I can maybe see why a carboy secondary can be useful because you can leave a lot of sediment behind, but be aware that by using a secondary and bottling you will be racking the beer up to 3 times (ones to the secondary, once to the bottling bucket and then once to the bottles) so you will most definitely be picking up some oxygen and potential contaminants.
OTOH as others have mentioned you can get the beer really bright by cold crashing on the yeast cake and racking directly from primary to bottling bucket. But there are a good share of homebrewers who don’t have the cold storage space to cold crash 5+ gallons of beer.
As far as yeast stripping the hop oils and aroma, it is best to dry hop once the yeast has flocculated. But you can always just add more yeast or crash the yeast in the primary first and then add the dry hops. I don;t understand why the yeast cake would affect hop oils or resins. My understanding is it is the yeast floccing out that drags these oils out of suspension.
I leave the beer in the primary until the krausen drops and the beer clears somewhat, then I check the gravity and rack when I get at least two of the same gravity readings on two consecutive days. I like to crash cool the primary at this juncture to allow a lot of the remaining yeast in suspension to drop out. I’ll then keg the beer and raise the temp to 60-65F to dry hop or I’ll keep the beer chilled if I want to force carbonate.
No secondary is fine if you don’t want to save your yeast and DH. Yes, you can DH in the keg, but that’s messy. You can also DH in the primary, but even with bags, some will still get into your yeast. Guess that’s not a big thing either if you wash it.
Edit: I should add that I don’t use a secondary all that much, because about the only beers I DH are larger beers and I don’t save the yeast from those anyway.
I use a secondary because it is part of my bottling process and lets me be lazy without worry. Once in the better bottle, you can get a carboy cab with a center hole for the racking cane and attach the bottling wand with a hose to the other end. Blow on the other tube to start the flow and you can bottle by yourself stress free. I found this to be the best way to bottle after lot’s of trial and error.
Also with the secondary I tend to DH often, which I think makes a better beer in many cases (and I like to DH anyway). You cam also park it there without worry because the beer will be just fine for as long as the laziness is there
I find it is the least messy and produces the best results.
Same here. Dry hops go into a bag. Easy to put in the keg, easy to remove…not messy at all. And a far fresher hop aroma than dry hopping in a secondary.

I use a secondary because it is part of my bottling process and lets me be lazy without worry.
Not trying to beat this thing to death, but I really don’t understand this line of reasoning. Yeah, I get that some people are busy or just plain lazy, and sure your beer may still seem “fine,” but I am trying to make the best beer possible; leaving a beer in secondary or primary for an extended period does not contribute to this. I suppose you could make a bit of a case for the benefits of bulk aging, but in my opinion, the potential exposure to oxygen in a non-pressurized primary or secondary is not worth the potential benefit of bulk aging.
Regardless of whether you have kegs or not, you want to ferment, clear and package your beer in a reasonable amount of time; procrastinating for the sake of procrastinating, just like transferring for the sake of transferring, will not improve the finished product.