The same old "do I need a starter" question...

Hi all. I think this is a question asked time and again but I need some opinions. I am brewing tomorrow, an American amber 1.056, in a 2.5 gallon batch. My WLP001 cal ale vial is dated July 3rd so a production date of March 3rd. The calculators have me at about 80% viability so I’m about 19 billion cells under optimum. My Feeling is to just pitch the vial cause even a .5 liter starter gets me to 145 billion cells. I guess I could just pitch the yeast into a 1.036 .5 liter starter in the morning while I’m brewing and let it sit on the stirplate for 4-6 hours and wake them cells up.

Thanks for any suggestions.

Stevo

It seems your target is 145 billion and you estimate 126 billion.  In yeast terms these numbers are pretty close.  Do a direct pitch.

Over 1.050, I like to do a starter when not repitching a slurry.  You can go with no starter or start your starter tomorrow early and don’t use the stir plate - then pitch the whole starter slurry at high krausen of the starter…just a thought.

Pitch

I think I am indeed leaning towards the direct pitch. After doing a bit more reading I’m thinking that a direct pitch may result in a slower lag time but it may help increase body and produce more fruity esters, hopefully pleasant ones. Also If what I’m reading is correct, it makes for healthier yeast if I plan to harvest, which I am planning to do. :wink:

Thanks to everybody for the response!!!

Stevo

Funny happenstance, I ended up missing my OG by a little, got 1.052 instead of 1.056 and only collected 2.3 gallons of wort into the fermenter so I only underpitched by 5 billion. :smiley:

5 billion is about 5% of a fresh tube/smack pack. If that is enough to significantly chabge your beer, your senses are way better than mine.

Which is a given for me!  Your beer will be fine.

Now see, I cant taste the difference between Tinseth and Rager,  but I dont think I could pick out a 2% under pitch