Makes two of us, I have many good reasons TO use dry yeasts. Anyway, I’ll be following this thread, it’s been a good read already. I just used 34/70 for the first time with an Amber Lager. I have brewed this recipe many times using Wyeast Bohemian Lager (the “same” strain) so I am looking forward to how they compare. In the spring I plan on giving S-189 a try for a Bock, seems that will be very fitting for the yeast.
goschman, every try any Mangrove Jack yeasts? They really kicked up their selection. They have both Bohemian and Bavarian dry lager yeasts. I have used the Bohemian and a couple other of their yeasts.
I’m a big fan of 37/70, but I used s-189 for my last lager and I will definitely use it again. It might even become my go-to yeast for lagers. I pitched at around 9C and ramped up over 5 or 6 days to 18 (the temp in my cellar), went on vacation, kegged it when I got back and put it in the fridge for about 3 weeks at 6-ish, then tapped. It’s possibly the best lager I’ve brewed and definitely had the most authentic Germanic lageriness of the lagers I’ve brewed.
I have not tried Mangrove Jack yet. I will have to give it a go. I mainly use fermentis unless I am brewing a kolsch as I tend to stick to American or German inspired beers. I do like their yeast for the most part if you stay away from some of the strains which don’t seem to get the job done. I mainly stick with 05, K97, 34/70 and 04 every once in a while. I will use T58 if I want a mild Belgian character…
Other than the lager strains any other you recommend from MJ? I just derailed my own thread after complaining about it. Sorry…
Pretty basic, hop-forward German-ish lager. Pils, Vienna, some flaked barley and a bit of carapils. Lots of hops, mostly Saaz. If you want more specifics, I can dig up the recipe.
As with most things in life the 80/20 rule also applies here. Some people are happy where they are and some strive for more. For some this is a hobby, and some this is an obsession.
I would switch to your lodo principles in a heartbeat if there was measurable imperial evidence that it produced superior beer. From what I see, there isn’t. There are two men on the internet telling everyone who will listen about how great it is, and plugging their website at every opportunity. And comments like the one above are condescending absolutions. Sorry man, but talking down to people like that and implying people that don’t adhere to your brewing technique are not striving for better beer is just rude.
Actually the dry yeasts don’t start out as the liquid equivalent and neither do the different brands of liquid yeasts. They are often different isolates of the same strain which explains why they have slightly different characteristics. Man I miss having Mark on the forum.
You can certainly do a starter to up your pitch count, obviously forgoing all the benefits of the dry. Those packs are quite expensive now-a-days so it may have been cheaper to propagate.