White Table Sugar

So, I searched the forum a little and couldn’t come up with much.  Honestly, I have a hard time searching what I want on this forum.  I can never find posts with what I am exactly searching, so sorry if I’m repeating something I missed.

I read recently that using white sugar is absolutely fine and will not produce any off (cidery, etc.) flavors in beer.  I only want to use about a pound in a new IIPA, to lighten the body and help dry it out.  Is this acceptable?  Estimated OG is going to be around 1.083 and 1# of sugar will be 6% of the “grist” for this beer.

One of the hardest things I had to make myself accept was that table sugar and corn sugar are interchangeable, at least in small quantities.  I haven’t used corn sugar for anything in probably 15 years, table sugar and demerara are what I use now when I need sugar in a beer.

I use table sugar all the time, up to about two or maybe 2.5 lbs in a 5 gallon batch, depending on gravity.

Unless you need a dark candi sugar, table sugar is just fine.  I’ve used demerara, sucanat, etc. and haven’t noticed any significant difference between them all.

As long as it’s not too great a % of your fermentables, no worries.

First off, I think we are a friendly group and we will be happy to answer any question regarding brewing as many times as necessary. So feel free to ask away. I never understood the forums that demanded you “search” first. A live an active forum thrives on people asking questions - even the same questions - and more importantly: answers change over time.

The cheapest sugar you can find, up to 15-20%, is absolutely fine. Belgian brewers use beet sugar up to those amounts and I don’t hear too many complaints about their beers.

They probably don’t drink enough beer. Oh, and table sugar is fine. I imagine the ‘cidery’ reputation comes from recipes for thin beer being thinned even further, probably coupled with poor yeast health which is compounded by the fact that sugar has no nutrients. Most of that is no longer a worry.

Don’t hesitate to ask any questions. We aim to please. You may or may not not like the answers, but you’re going to get them. Varying as they may be, but at least you’ll have choices.

I use table (cane or beet) sugar to help dry out the beer. It helps reduce the final gravity as it is 100% fermentable. I often use 1-2 lbs in a 5 gallon batch depending on how much attenuation I want to achieve.

When I did my first extract brews 20 years ago I always got cider and I blamed the sugar because that’s what I read caused it.  I think that’s totally false.  For me, I’m 100% sure my cider flavours came from the fermentation temps and in particular the yeast strains I was getting.  I know I could make the same beer today and not have any cider.

Anyway, I use 1 lb of white sugar in saisons and it’s not detectable at all.  Go for it.

Just make sure you don’t overplay or overdo the sugar. Even one pound can dry your beer out and leave you with a harshly bitter and alcoholic tasting brew. You want to balance the hops, malt and alcohol to create a harmonious combination.

I am in general agreement with respect to white sugar or corn sugar…there is little difference.  When you get into the less refined sugars, then you are talking about flavor nuances that can be desirable.

Another aspect that came up at my club’s meeting on Saturday was the issue of “Inverting” the sugar with heat and an acid.  The thought was that you are saving the yeast from having to enzymatically invert the sugar prior to consumption.  It seems easy enough, but is it needed or necessary in brewing and fermenting?

I get what I’m looking for without the extra step of inverting the sugar.  So I’ve never tried.

As for the nuances from less-refined sugar, in my experience the nuances can be so subtle as to be imperceptible.  Thus, I’ve chosen to save a few dollars lately and have been using plain ol’ table sugar.

But I did run through just about all the less-refine sugars at the health food store to arrive at this decision.  Of them, my recollection is that I like the flavor from sucanat the most, but not enough to pay the price of organic sugar.

I have found no difference in the end result between using inverted or non inverted sugar.  It seems to be an issue where theory is overwhelming simply tasting the beer and deciding.

you should give coconut sugar a try if you haven’t already. I used a couple lb of that in a giant saison and it is really present in the aroma and the taste, At least in the samples.

EDIT
one comment to the OP, and it may be entirely moot, but if you or any of your friends who share your brew are hardcore vegans or vegetarians you may want to look carefully when selecting the white sugar to use (brown sugar to probably, and possible corn sugar I don’t know) as much of it utilizes bone char as a final fining step to get that blinding white color. (some of) those that don’t are labeled as Vegan

Coconut - my wife hates coconut.

When I buy mixed chocolates, I have to be sure there’s no coconut.

The only reason I’ll invert my sugar is for ease of handling. I really can’t tell a flavor difference between invert and plain. I have noticed a difference between dextrose and sucrose, though. A large amount of dextrose with phenolic yeast (I’ve only tried it with T-58 so far) gives the beer more clove. This is only apparent in large amounts (like 20% of fermentables). I might be completely wrong and it’s just coincidental.

I am out in wilds of Afghanistan and don’t have my notes, but I thought the general concept of “inverting” the sugar alleviates the problem of yeast spitting out a particular phenol when it has to convert the sugar itself - or perhaps when it eats non-inverted sugar?  Any of the chemists out there please chime in.

In Colorado it is easy to get beet sugar at the grocery store - it is sold as regular table sugar. That is what I use in all my recipes that call for sugar. However, I sill use corn sugar for bottling - mainly Belgian-inspired beers. Just habit I guess.

Pet Peeve time

First, there is no problem is using sugar.

The Peeve,  Adding Sugar does NOT thin or lighten a beer.  It is the removal or reduction of malt, which is only partially fermentable, that thins or lightens beer.  We remove the malt to allow us to add the sugar to retain a targeted OG with less malt.

I’ve used table sugar and I’ve used corn sugar with no noticeable differences in the finished product. But I swear I read once that white table sugar created headache inducing alcohol and corn sugar does not. Is there any truth to that?

For the most part I agree with the thinning theory. However, if you add a pound of sugar to your wort, you are adding volume to that wort. The sugar will ferment 100%, so there is less malt in a slightly higher volume, thus it’s thinner.

Will you taste that it’s thinner or that it has more alcohol. My guess is that the alcohol will outweigh the thinness in terms of flavor.

I dunno, maybe it’s six of one - half a dozen of the other.

I typically use sugar to achieve a higher gravity without having an overwhelmingly sweet or malty beer.

Is it “thinner” or lighter in body than it would be if it was all malt?  Sure.

But if it was all malt, it would have too much body and probably be unbalanced.  And less quaffable.

So, yes, using sugar will produce a thinner/lighter body beer at a given gravity.  But not necessarily a thin beer.

If I’m making any sense.

Probably not, but if you had really unhealthy yeast and also used sugar (which has no nutrients) you’d probably end up with more of whatever off-flavors those yeast were producing. This is probably where most of those stories come from.