I’ve always purchased Bairds MO for our Amber. Last order came in and it was Thomas Fawcett MO. I didn’t think any big deal until I opened the bag. Much more foreign material in the Fawcett. At least it seemed that way.
Anyone have direct experience with these two malt companies?
I’ve always preferred Crisp or Bairds over Thomas Fawcett. I would get the lowest efficiency with fawcett than the others (not by much just 2-3%) The flavor was slightly more muted than the others as well. Works good if that’s all you can get, but for a commercial operation I’d guess you want to stick with the same maltster for a consistent product
Wow. Can’t believe what I’m reading. Thomas Fawcett MO is my favorite MO. Better than Crisp. Way better than Bairds. Better efficiency. More character from the TF. Hate the way they seal their bags, but everything else is top of the line IMO.
OK, let’s all lay the crack pipes down a second a talk. How’s the quality of the beer made with TF? I think TF is the best tasting Maris Otter that you can find readily. Just wish they sealed the plastic lining to the outside of the bag. The whole plastic lining slides out with the malt if your not careful.
Hell, I’m maltster specific and I brew on the stove top!
I’m really replying because I’m working my way through my third maltster for MO. First sack was Warminster Floor Malted MO, then Crisp, now Bairds. Up next is TF. My first beer with Bairds is just about ready to be put on tap. I found a better flavor in Crisp than Warminster, more bread crusts and a bit more toast, but other than that, it was a wash.