I’ve only ever used Lallemand and Fermentis for dry yeast. But Cellar Science seems to have an ever-growing selection, and they’re consistently 30-50% cheaper than Lallemand and Fermentis. Are they any good?
I have used their Cali yeast with good results. With that said, I am not a pro so take it for what it is worth. I think it started a bit slow if I remember right, but seemed to do what it was supposed to do.
Cali (ok) - reportedly US-05, though I’m not convinced, as it seems slightly different
German (solid) - basically 34/70, I think
Baja (decent) - might be Modelo’s or a slight downgrade of it; it has been solid enough but not necessarily amazing as I had hoped
I just got a packet of Monk (Belgian trappist??) which I will be trying out in the coming months for Tripel, Quad, and other experiments. My experiences with the other Cellar Science products were good enough to convince me to try out Monk.
The prices are easy to like, and the beers have all turned out solid enoough (so far), but I have other dry yeasts (Diamond, S-189, Verdant, Koln, etc) that I like a bit better, so I am not sure how often I’ll use CS yeast.
I guess I am the oddball. As much as I really wanted them to be outstanding, I did not care for the results with the Cellar Science yeast strains I tried. I got slow starts, sluggish fermentation, mediocre attenuation, ‘interesting’ flavors, etc. I quickly went back to tried and true even if I am paying more.
One day, you’ll wake up and there won’t be anymore time to do the things you’ve always wanted to do. Don’t wait. Do it now.
I also tried Baja and also found it just ok. I made the exact same beer (8 months apart, mind you), one with Baja, one with WY2112. Both cleared beautifully, but Baja was a bit bready to me, not as crisp as I would have liked. 2112 was fantastic.